Thank you.
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:17:48PM -0800, Paul G. wrote:
> >...for as long as -mno-cygwin switch, or use thereof, is not being
> >deprecated...if, however, -mno-cygwin is being deprecated or the use
> >thereof is being "officially" deprecated, then what's the point in
> >talking about
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:17:48PM -0800, Paul G. wrote:
>...for as long as -mno-cygwin switch, or use thereof, is not being
>deprecated...if, however, -mno-cygwin is being deprecated or the use
>thereof is being "officially" deprecated, then what's the point in
>talking about it in the first place
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 09:07:57PM -0800, Paul G. wrote:
> >> Redirecting this, too.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 03:18:00PM -0800, Paul G. wrote:
> >> >Well, if your Win32 system doesn't support links (NT4 shortcuts), this
> >> >isn't really surprising.
> >>
> >> Did you actually
and how it arose, we'd be glad to hear about it.
Currently, the "gcc-mingw" is a dependency of the "gcc" package so it
will be installed by default with gcc in a normal install unless the
user has requested otherwise.
Larry
Original Message:
-----
From: Jim [EMAI
> I think you misunderstand. "It adds the "-mno-cygwin" functionality to the
> standard gcc package."
Oh certainly I understood since 2 days ago I started a thread that such
functionality was broken, and everyone said 'well certainly it's something
you have misconfigured' when it wasn't my fault
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:55:32PM -, Vince Hoffman wrote:
>I think you misunderstand. "It adds the "-mno-cygwin" functionality to the
>standard gcc package."
>is just the description of what the gcc-mingw package does. Its what it's
>always done. Its not a new feature, or am i missing somethin
-
> From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 17 December 2002 14:41
> To: cygwin-apps; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Gcc 3.2 -mno-cygwin
>
>
> 20:45 [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-mingw-20020817-3
>
>
> Several hours after I posted a notice of the problem th
20:45 [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-mingw-20020817-3
Several hours after I posted a notice of the problem the above was posted...
in it's message content is : It adds the "-mno-cygwin"
functionality to the standard gcc package.
So yeah - it was all totally my fault. and Gosh - I guess it W
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 09:07:57PM -0800, Paul G. wrote:
>> Redirecting this, too.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 03:18:00PM -0800, Paul G. wrote:
>> >Well, if your Win32 system doesn't support links (NT4 shortcuts), this
>> >isn't really surprising.
>>
>> Did you actually read this email or
> Redirecting this, too.
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 03:18:00PM -0800, Paul G. wrote:
> >Well, if your Win32 system doesn't support links (NT4 shortcuts), this
> >isn't really surprising.
>
> Did you actually read this email or were you just scanning for keywords
> like the word "link"?
At 06:27 PM 12/15/2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:15:42AM -0800, Jim wrote:
> >Someone broke GCC somewhere
> >
> >echo 'int main( void ) { return 1; }' >test.c
> >gcc -mno-cygwin -c test.c
> >
> >results:
> >gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `cc1': No such file
Redirecting this, too.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 03:18:00PM -0800, Paul G. wrote:
>Well, if your Win32 system doesn't support links (NT4 shortcuts), this
>isn't really surprising.
Did you actually read this email or were you just scanning for keywords
like the word "link"?
>NT4 has a shortcut/link
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:15:42AM -0800, Jim wrote:
>Someone broke GCC somewhere
>
>echo 'int main( void ) { return 1; }' >test.c
>gcc -mno-cygwin -c test.c
>
>results:
>gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `cc1': No such file or directory
>
>there is definatly no cc1 with gcc 3.2 (not sure
13 matches
Mail list logo
