Greetings, cyg Simple!
> On 8/29/2018 6:01 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>>
>> I think we need a "build-essential" metapackage.
>>
> I would suggest base-devel as the name of the metapackage.
build-essential is a name of a well-known Debian metapackage.
> But what exactly should that include?
Pack
On 8/29/2018 6:01 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>
> I think we need a "build-essential" metapackage.
>
I would suggest base-devel as the name of the metapackage. But what
exactly should that include? Should there be more than one metapackage
that adds more complex tools?
--
cyg Simple
--
Problem
If you want to compile native Windows programs, Cygwin is likely not the
tool you need.
If you can tell me another way to compile C source code that was written to
run under Linux
to run them on Windows without having to change them, I'm all ears!
Tom L
--
Problem reports: http://cygwi
Greetings, tl...@twcny.rr.com!
>>> I uninstalled and deleted the entire cygwin64 directory and
>>> reinstalled using the defaults. The download time was much shorter but
>>> I still can't compile anything with the C compiler even with no anti-virus
>> running.
>
>> Base cygwin installation is a P
Am 29.08.2018 um 02:16 schrieb tl...@twcny.rr.com:
I uninstalled and deleted the entire cygwin64 directory and reinstalled using
the defaults. The download time was much
shorter but I still can't compile anything with the C compiler even with no
anti-virus running.
I'm surprised the default in
> I uninstalled and deleted the entire cygwin64 directory and
> reinstalled using the defaults. The download time was much shorter but
> I still can't compile anything with the C compiler even with no anti-virus
running.
Base cygwin installation is a POSIX userspace and essential Cygwin tools, i
Greetings, tl...@twcny.rr.com!
> I uninstalled and deleted the entire cygwin64 directory and reinstalled
> using the defaults. The download time was much shorter but I still can't
> compile anything with the C compiler even with no anti-virus running.
Base cygwin installation is a POSIX userspace
>> Can you test with just
>> PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin/:/usr/lib/lapack"
>> to exclude other programs ?
>>
>> I just tried that. Same problem.
>>
>> #2 you have installed every cygwin package including all
>> debuginfo packages. Why ?
>>
>> I'd rather have it and not need it than need it an
On 8/26/2018 11:28 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> Am 26.08.2018 um 16:54 schrieb tl...@twcny.rr.com:
>>
>> Can you test with just
>> PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin/:/usr/lib/lapack"
>> to exclude other programs ?
>>
>> I just tried that. Same problem.
>>
>> #2 you have installed every cygwin package inc
reply on the mailing list please.
Am 26.08.2018 um 16:54 schrieb tl...@twcny.rr.com:
can you test with these two disabled ?
Windows defender is known to interfere.
I'll try it but it was working fine before the last three builds of Windows.
Nothing else has changed.
except may be they have c
Am 25.08.2018 um 04:32 schrieb tl...@twcny.rr.com:
can you upload somewhere ?
Any Antivirus around ?
Here's a link to my cygcheck.out file.
I'm running Microsoft's anti-virus for Win 10 and Malwarebytes Premium.
can you test with these two disabled ?
Windows defender is known to interfere.
can you upload somewhere ?
Any Antivirus around ?
Here's a link to my cygcheck.out file.
I'm running Microsoft's anti-virus for Win 10 and Malwarebytes Premium.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ta5v8ws04h5aggx/cygcheck.out?raw=1
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
12 matches
Mail list logo
