On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:35:21AM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>On 9/26/05, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Sep 26 09:35, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:47:28PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > >...Cygwin is also supported in the 32 bit environment WOW64 on 64 b
On 9/26/05, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep 26 09:35, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:47:28PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >...Cygwin is also supported in the 32 bit environment WOW64 on 64 bit
> > >versions of Windows XP and 2K3, but that there are no plans to creat
On Sep 26 09:35, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:47:28PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >...Cygwin is also supported in the 32 bit environment WOW64 on 64 bit
> >versions of Windows XP and 2K3, but that there are no plans to create a
> >native 64 bit version of Cygwin.
>
>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:47:28PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>...Cygwin is also supported in the 32 bit environment WOW64 on 64 bit
>versions of Windows XP and 2K3, but that there are no plans to create a
>native 64 bit version of Cygwin.
OTOH, I'm sure there are interested parties around who
On Sep 25 21:01, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 05:36:23PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> >Cygwin can be expected to run on all modern 32 bit versions of
> >Windows, except Windows CE. This includes Windows 95/98/ME/NT/2000/XP.
> >Since Cygwin is a community-supported f
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 05:36:23PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>On 9/25/05, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I has been brought to my attention that the Copyright section in the FAQ
>> are attempting to paraphrase the words at http://cygwin.com/licensing.html .
>
>Done, turned http://cygwin.co
On 9/25/05, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I has been brought to my attention that the Copyright section in the FAQ
> are attempting to paraphrase the words at http://cygwin.com/licensing.html .
Done, turned http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.copyright.html#faq.what.copyright
into a link, and http://cygwin.co
I has been brought to my attention that the Copyright section in the FAQ
are attempting to paraphrase the words at http://cygwin.com/licensing.html .
I've said this before, but I don't think it's a good idea to have the
FAQ attempt to describe things that are already talked about in other
places i
8 matches
Mail list logo