RE: Extended attributes

2014-01-19 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello! > I'm really not inclined to add this. As it is, the NTFS xattr are > always treated as user attributes. An NTFS attr "foo.bar" is returned > as "user.foo.bar" and when writing, a "user.foo.bar" is written as > "foo.bar". Adding other attribute types requires to add some special > casin

Re: Extended attributes

2014-01-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
t when >> > > manipulating UNIX archives etc these attributes could be kept along >> > > with files ? At least we have one use case now. >> > >> > That doesn't make sense. Extended attributes as implemented by Windows >> > are user attribut

Re: Extended attributes

2014-01-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
ng > > > with files ? At least we have one use case now. > > > > That doesn't make sense. Extended attributes as implemented by Windows > > are user attributes, not system attributes. The non-user attributes on > > Linux have a very special meaning to the ker

RE: Extended attributes

2014-01-15 Thread Pavel Fedin
> > That doesn't make sense. Extended attributes as implemented by Windows > are user attributes, not system attributes. The non-user attributes on > Linux have a very special meaning to the kernel and/or are restricted > to privileged users only. Their functionality is

Re: Extended attributes

2014-01-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
; > Yes, i have checked that. > What do you think about adding other possible namespaces (system, > security, and... don't remember the 3rd one) ? So that when > manipulating UNIX archives etc these attributes could be kept along > with files ? At least we have one u

RE: Extended attributes

2014-01-14 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello! > "user." xattrs are supported, but no others. This is partially to have > smooth support of xattrs when using Samba shares. See the attr > package and the getxattr, etc. calls in Cygwin's ntea.cc. Yes, i have checked that. What do you think about adding other possible namespaces (sy

Re: Extended attributes

2014-01-13 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 13 17:53, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > > Is there any support for xattrs ? I sometimes work with SquashFS images > which make use of them (like security.capability) and i'd like to be able to > store them along files. > If not implemented, can this be somehow fulfilled ? For example, we

Extended attributes

2014-01-13 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello! Is there any support for xattrs ? I sometimes work with SquashFS images which make use of them (like security.capability) and i'd like to be able to store them along files. If not implemented, can this be somehow fulfilled ? For example, we could store them in a dedicated NTFS stream. Ki