-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[followup discussion should move to cygwin-apps]
According to René Berber on 8/16/2007 10:40 PM:
>>From setup.ini, line 11746, the package is uw-imap-imapd, the requires should
>>be:
>
> requires: uw-imap openssl097
>
> Also uw-imap-util, same chan
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to René Berber on 8/16/2007 1:50 PM:
>> Michael Grand wrote:
>
>>> I installed openssl097 and it works. Thanks for the help.
>> So it was an error in the (setup) installation database.
>
> I saw the end of this thread, but didn't catch the answer: Which package's
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to René Berber on 8/16/2007 1:50 PM:
> Michael Grand wrote:
>
>> I installed openssl097 and it works. Thanks for the help.
>
> So it was an error in the (setup) installation database.
I saw the end of this thread, but didn't catch the ans
Michael Grand wrote:
> I installed openssl097 and it works. Thanks for the help.
So it was an error in the (setup) installation database.
> There is still a problem where exim will not act as an outgoing SMTP
> server unless I add everyone's IP to relay_from_hosts, but since this is
> not an ex
René Berber wrote:
I have both openssl libraries, and this old version of imap depends on the
0.9.7
version of openssl. There is a separate package named openssl097, perhaps
the
imap package has the wrong dependency and only checked for the latest
openssl...
if so, then you found a bug in the
Michael Grand wrote:
> I added uw-imapd.exe, uw-ipop2d.exe and uw-ipop3d.exe to the exceptions
> and I made sure that /var/mail and /var/spool/mail are the same
> directory. When I attempt to run uw-imapd, it still gives no output. I
> also tried disabling AVG's Email Scanner, but still nothing.
René Berber wrote:
So again, its not working as intended for you. That test was with the
older
imapd, which I still have around but not use.
I still think the cause of the problem is a firewall, inetd is allowed to
use
ports 110 and 143 but when control is passed to imapd is blocked. So you
Michael Grand wrote:
> I think /var/mail exists because I followed the instructions in this
> article: http://pigtail.net/LRP/exim/exim-cygwin.html
Ugh! That guy is known to make a mess, I don't say the instructions are wrong,
I didn't read them or need them, but too many people come here after
Sorry, I used the wrong email address. The hotmail address that replied
last is me.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin
René Berber wrote:
Wrong again, I have a soft link, not a hard link. It doesn't make a
difference
but you could also use:
ln -s /var/mail /var/spool/mail
But there's something wrong here, you said /var/mail does exist, it didn't
in my
case. I had /var/spool/mail and created the link as `ln
René Berber wrote:
> Michael Grand wrote:
>
>> René Berber wrote:
>>
>>> They have to be the same directory, thus the hardlink (man ln):
>>>
>>> ln /var/mail/spool /var/mail
>>>
>>> of course this has to be done after you delete the directory you created.
>> /var/mail/spool does not exist. Do you
Michael Grand wrote:
> René Berber wrote:
>
>> They have to be the same directory, thus the hardlink (man ln):
>>
>> ln /var/mail/spool /var/mail
>>
>> of course this has to be done after you delete the directory you created.
>
> /var/mail/spool does not exist. Do you mean /var/spool ?
No, I c
René Berber wrote:
They have to be the same directory, thus the hardlink (man ln):
ln /var/mail/spool /var/mail
of course this has to be done after you delete the directory you created.
/var/mail/spool does not exist. Do you mean /var/spool ?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/
Michael Grand wrote:
> René Berber wrote:
>
>> Oops! I forgot something I did to make imap work, exim and uw-imap have
>> different definitions of the mail spool so I did a hard link between
>> /var/mail
>> and /var/mail/spool. That probably is what the error "The network
>> path was not
>> foun
René Berber wrote:
Oops! I forgot something I did to make imap work, exim and uw-imap have
different definitions of the mail spool so I did a hard link between
/var/mail
and /var/mail/spool. That probably is what the error "The network path
was not
found" meant, imapd could not find /var/mai
Michael Grand :
Oops! I forgot something I did to make imap work, exim and uw-imap have
different definitions of the mail spool so I did a hard link between /var/mail
and /var/mail/spool. That probably is what the error "The network path was not
found" meant, imapd could not find /var/mail.
--
R
Chris Taylor wrote:
They tend to proxy incoming mail ports. If you happen to be running a
mailserver on localhost, this is usually going to break.
Almost all of those connections will be to AVG (though thunderbird will
not be aware of that).
I disabled AVG's "E-Mail Scanner" but I still canno
Michael Grand wrote:
René Berber wrote:
Probably your firewall is blocking any communication.
I have tried this with the firewall turned off, and I still cannot
connect. The port is in the allow list, so it should work anyways.
Would AVG or SpySweeper block the pop3 and imap ports? Exim a
René Berber wrote:
Probably your firewall is blocking any communication.
I have tried this with the firewall turned off, and I still cannot connect.
The port is in the allow list, so it should work anyways. Would AVG or
SpySweeper block the pop3 and imap ports? Exim appears to work fine, a
Michael Grand wrote:
> Thanks, putting -D in the arguments list fixed the problem. However, it
> does not let me access the pop3 server or the imap server. Here is what
> my output looks like:
> $ telnet localhost 110
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to FAMILYROOM.
> Escape character is '^]'.
>
Thanks, putting -D in the arguments list fixed the problem. However, it
does not let me access the pop3 server or the imap server. Here is what my
output looks like:
$ telnet localhost 110
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to FAMILYROOM.
Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by foreign host.
Michael Grand wrote:
> It appears as though "inetd --install-as-service" is either bugged or I
> somehow used it incorrectly (although I can't see how that would have
> happened, it's pretty straight forward). I reinstalled inetutils and
> instead of running "inetd --install-as-service" I ran thi
It appears as though "inetd --install-as-service" is either bugged or I
somehow used it incorrectly (although I can't see how that would have
happened, it's pretty straight forward). I reinstalled inetutils and
instead of running "inetd --install-as-service" I ran this command:
'cygrunsrv -I i
Michael Grand wrote:
> René Berber wrote:
>
>> What about `inetd --install-as-service`?
>
> Yes, although possibly not in the version of cygcheck that I attached,
> as I have been through several reinstalls to try and fix this. I have
> attached a new cygcheck result.
>
>
>> does `cygrunsrv -
René Berber wrote:
What about `inetd --install-as-service`?
Yes, although possibly not in the version of cygcheck that I attached, as I
have been through several reinstalls to try and fix this. I have attached a
new cygcheck result.
does `cygrunsrv -Q inetd` or a `cygrunsrv -L` shows th
Michael Grand wrote:
> René Berber wrote:
>
>> Looking at your cygcheck.out inetd doesn't appear as a service, did you
>> run
>> iu-config? have you read /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/inetutils-1.3.2.README?
>
> Yes and yes.
What about `inetd --install-as-service`? does `cygrunsrv -Q inetd` or a
`cyg
René Berber wrote:
Looking at your cygcheck.out inetd doesn't appear as a service, did you
run
iu-config? have you read /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/inetutils-1.3.2.README?
Yes and yes.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/pr
Michael Grand wrote:
> When I attempt to start inetd using "net start inetd" it reports this error:
> "The service is not responding to the control function". The service is
> installed, and I can attempt to run it from the services manager but I get
> this error: "Error 1053: The service did not
When I attempt to start inetd using "net start inetd" it reports this error:
"The service is not responding to the control function". The service is
installed, and I can attempt to run it from the services manager but I get
this error: "Error 1053: The service did not respond to the start or co
29 matches
Mail list logo
