On Thursday 21 Mar 02, Robert Mark Bram writes:
> I take that back - I have found references to Emacs, but can anyone point me
> in the right direction for a download site (hopefully with a few
> instructions)?
Since GNU Emacs is not a Cygwin application, such a query is off-topic
for this list.
, 20 March 2002 11:49 PM
To: Cygwin
Subject: Emacs for cygwin?
Hi all!
I just visited the archives and cygwin.com and could not get any positive
hit, but this seems like such an important utility. Is it true there is no
emacs for Cygwin?
Thanks!
Rob
:)
:-}
;->
--
Unsubscribe info: h
Hi all!
I just visited the archives and cygwin.com and could not get any positive
hit, but this seems like such an important utility. Is it true there is no
emacs for Cygwin?
Thanks!
Rob
:)
:-}
;->
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug report
Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> Jon Cast wrote:
>
> > Sorry to start a flamewar, but this needs replying to:
>
> Sure. In PRIVATE mail.
>
> Please take this incipient flamewar offline.
I have no interest in a flame war even offline. I didn't even understand
half of what Jon was saying about politi
"Katherina O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am very interested in a cygwin/xfree86 emacs,
Thank you for your interest.
> However I must mention that I am very happy that xemacs is available
> in a cygwin version.
Naturally.
> In the past I tried porting emacs to cygwin/xfree86/less
Jon Cast wrote:
> Sorry to start a flamewar, but this needs replying to:
Sure. In PRIVATE mail.
Please take this incipient flamewar offline.
--Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:
Hello,
I am very interested in a cygwin/xfree86
emacs, because NTemacs can't be regarded
as an full emacs port, and xemacs isn't
really compatible, and much too slow.
Furthermore I believe that since the
21.1 emacs has become better than xemacs.
However I must mention that I am very
happy that xe
Sorry to start a flamewar, but this needs replying to:
"John A. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> smiley notwithstanding, that doesn't seem all that amusing to me
Of course not. After all, you (and all those Linux supporters and
every one else (referring to the Linux supporters, not to you
Jon Cast wrote:
> FWIW, I'm a GNU fanatic who wouldn't touch XEmacs with a ten-foot
> pole :)
smiley notwithstanding, that doesn't seem all that amusing to me
XEmacs is of course GPL'd, and I'd direct anyone who might wonder
about the source of misguided comments such as the above to:
http://w
David Rothenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, there's a true Cygwin port of XEmacs available now (as well as
> a Windows-native port). See http://www.xemacs.org
FWIW, I'm a GNU fanatic who wouldn't touch XEmacs with a ten-foot
pole :)
Seriously, this kind of message is one (although b
FWIW, there's a true Cygwin port of XEmacs available now (as well as a
Windows-native port). See http://www.xemacs.org
Jon Cast wrote:
>
> You wrote:
>
> > I think that we need a CygEmacs - an emacs that will be compiled
> > with the real Cygwin ported gcc (i.e. without the
> > -mno-cygwin).
>
bly calls for a
new symbol rather than reusing windows-nt, but the work has to be done
anyway. I counted more than 120 places where windows-nt is mentioned
in bundled Lisp code.
> > may be a version of Emacs for Cygwin, that use only the UNIX APIs
> > can be ported. This Emacs versio
use the native APIs
directly.
> If this is too difficult,
It's certainly non-trivial, but it's not difficult, either. All it
takes is a grep for WINDOWSNT, and then a check of each of those ~ 206
occurrences to see if each one should read WINDOWSNT or (WINDOWSNT ||
CYGWIN).
> ma
and vim? gimme a break :-(
> If this is too difficult, may be a version of Emacs for Cygwin, that
> use only the UNIX APIs can be ported. This Emacs version will be used
> only within Cygwin's windows - Console or rxvt (Emacs in TTY mode) or
> real display (using Cygwin-Xfree).
>
already done (partly) by the
Cygwin port of rxvt.
If this is too difficult, may be a version of Emacs for Cygwin, that
use only the UNIX APIs can be ported. This Emacs version will be used
only within Cygwin's windows - Console or rxvt (Emacs in TTY mode) or
real display (using Cygwin-Xfree).
A
15 matches
Mail list logo
