On 1/3/2012 4:20 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> but it sounds interesting (especially if it allows less-frequent
>> invocation of the rebaseall ritual).
>
> Since the VAST majority of UNIX/linux programs use fork/exec I don't
> see how this would really have much of an effect.
The idea is to ad
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:43:30PM -0500, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>On 03/01/2012 5:25 PM, dan...@dancol.org wrote:
>> posix_spawn [1] is an optional POSIX facility that allows programs to
>> start other programs without using fork or vfork. I've created an
>> efficient implementation of posix_spawn for
On 1/3/2012 2:43 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> On 03/01/2012 5:25 PM, dan...@dancol.org wrote:
>> posix_spawn [1] is an optional POSIX facility that allows programs to
>> start other programs without using fork or vfork. I've created an
>> efficient implementation of posix_spawn for Cygwin. The code is
On 03/01/2012 5:25 PM, dan...@dancol.org wrote:
posix_spawn [1] is an optional POSIX facility that allows programs to
start other programs without using fork or vfork. I've created an
efficient implementation of posix_spawn for Cygwin. The code is available
at https://github.com/dcolascione/cygsp
posix_spawn [1] is an optional POSIX facility that allows programs to
start other programs without using fork or vfork. I've created an
efficient implementation of posix_spawn for Cygwin. The code is available
at https://github.com/dcolascione/cygspawn.
This library uses Cygwin's nonstandard spawn
5 matches
Mail list logo