On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:03:24AM -0600, Jeremy Bopp wrote:
>On 02/08/2012 09:49 AM, Jesse Ziser wrote:
>> On 2/7/2012 11:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 05:14:59PM -0600, Jesse Ziser wrote:
If you really want Mingw (a free compiler and development environment
>>>
On 2/8/2012 10:04 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 8 09:49, Jesse Ziser wrote:
On 2/7/2012 11:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
The MinGW cross-compiles are not "barely supported". They are included
in the distribution precisely so that people can build pure-windows
programs under Cygwin.
On Feb 8 09:49, Jesse Ziser wrote:
> On 2/7/2012 11:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >The MinGW cross-compiles are not "barely supported". They are included
> >in the distribution precisely so that people can build pure-windows
> >programs under Cygwin.
>
> Oh? Then I got the wrong impression
On 02/08/2012 09:49 AM, Jesse Ziser wrote:
> On 2/7/2012 11:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 05:14:59PM -0600, Jesse Ziser wrote:
>>> If you really want Mingw (a free compiler and development environment
>>> for Windows), maybe what you should do is just download and inst
On 2/7/2012 11:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 05:14:59PM -0600, Jesse Ziser wrote:
On 2/7/2012 4:14 PM, carolus wrote:
On 2/7/2012 3:12 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
There's the usual misconception about the GPL. If you create an
application which is linked against the
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 12:24:39AM -0600, carolus wrote:
>On 2/7/2012 11:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> Actually, you can easily bundle a program with the Cygwin DLL and have
>> it work fine.
>
>I confess to doing that for a while, until I learned about -mno-cygwin,
>but is that not a licen
On Feb 8 00:24, carolus wrote:
> On 2/7/2012 11:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> >Actually, you can easily bundle a program with the Cygwin DLL and have
> >it work fine.
>
> I confess to doing that for a while, until I learned about
> -mno-cygwin, but is that not a license violation? My und
On 2/7/2012 11:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Actually, you can easily bundle a program with the Cygwin DLL and have
it work fine.
I confess to doing that for a while, until I learned about -mno-cygwin,
but is that not a license violation? My understanding is that in order
to conform to t
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 05:14:59PM -0600, Jesse Ziser wrote:
>On 2/7/2012 4:14 PM, carolus wrote:
>> On 2/7/2012 3:12 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>
>>> There's the usual misconception about the GPL. If you create an
>>> application which is linked against the Cygwin DLL (or any other GPLed
>>> li
On 2/7/2012 5:14 PM, Jesse Ziser wrote:
Well, if you don't want them to have to install Cygwin, then that's a
bigger issue than just licensing. Think of Cygwin like an OS. If you
want to create something that can run under Windows, not Cygwin, then
you have to build it for Windows, not Cygwin.
On 2/7/2012 4:14 PM, carolus wrote:
On 2/7/2012 3:12 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
There's the usual misconception about the GPL. If you create an
application which is linked against the Cygwin DLL (or any other GPLed
library), but you only use the application in-house, there's no reason
at all t
On 2/7/2012 3:12 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
There's the usual misconception about the GPL. If you create an
application which is linked against the Cygwin DLL (or any other GPLed
library), but you only use the application in-house, there's no reason
at all to distribute the source code to your
2012/2/7 Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 7 14:10, carolus wrote:
>> On 2/7/2012 1:51 PM, Tim Prince wrote:
>> >On 2/6/2012 2:29 PM, Charles D. Russell wrote:
>> >
>> >>i686-w64-mingw32-gfortran.exe hello.f -o hello
>> >>
>> >>cdr@dell03 ~/mingtest
>> >>$ ./hello
>> >>/home/cdr/mingtest/hello.exe:
On Feb 7 14:10, carolus wrote:
> On 2/7/2012 1:51 PM, Tim Prince wrote:
> >On 2/6/2012 2:29 PM, Charles D. Russell wrote:
> >
> >>i686-w64-mingw32-gfortran.exe hello.f -o hello
> >>
> >>cdr@dell03 ~/mingtest
> >>$ ./hello
> >>/home/cdr/mingtest/hello.exe: error while loading shared libraries:
> >>
On 2/7/2012 10:42 AM, marco atzeri wrote:
On 2/7/2012 5:13 PM, carolus wrote:
On 2/6/2012 5:05 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
The -mno-cygwin flag is still handled by gcc3, but that is deprecated
and may be removed at any time. The officially supported way to
build such apps is to use the approp
On 2/7/2012 1:44 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
On 6 February 2012 14:29, Charles D. Russell wrote:
cdr@dell03 ~/mingtest
$ make hello
i686-w64-mingw32-gfortran.exehello.f -o hello
cdr@dell03 ~/mingtest
$ ./hello
/home/cdr/mingtest/hello.exe: error while loading shared libraries:
libgfortran-
On 2/7/2012 2:26 PM, Tim Prince wrote:
How about the recent suggestion of -static?
That solves my problem. It took a while for the suggestion to sink in.
Thanks
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: h
On 2/7/2012 3:10 PM, carolus wrote:
On 2/7/2012 1:51 PM, Tim Prince wrote:
On 2/6/2012 2:29 PM, Charles D. Russell wrote:
i686-w64-mingw32-gfortran.exe hello.f -o hello
cdr@dell03 ~/mingtest
$ ./hello
/home/cdr/mingtest/hello.exe: error while loading shared libraries:
libgfortran-
3.dll: cann
On 2/7/2012 1:51 PM, Tim Prince wrote:
On 2/6/2012 2:29 PM, Charles D. Russell wrote:
i686-w64-mingw32-gfortran.exe hello.f -o hello
cdr@dell03 ~/mingtest
$ ./hello
/home/cdr/mingtest/hello.exe: error while loading shared libraries:
libgfortran-
3.dll: cannot open shared object file: No such f
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 10:26 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> FWIW, I build setup.exe on linux with a carefully-constructed environment
> which just uses your Cygwin cross-compiler but adds the MinGW bits while
> removing the Cygwin bits.
That's why I ship mingw32-*-static packages in fedora-cygw
On 2/6/2012 2:29 PM, Charles D. Russell wrote:
i686-w64-mingw32-gfortran.exe hello.f -o hello
cdr@dell03 ~/mingtest
$ ./hello
/home/cdr/mingtest/hello.exe: error while loading shared libraries:
libgfortran-
3.dll: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
The cygwin distribut
On 6 February 2012 14:29, Charles D. Russell wrote:
> cdr@dell03 ~/mingtest
> $ make hello
> i686-w64-mingw32-gfortran.exe hello.f -o hello
>
> cdr@dell03 ~/mingtest
> $ ./hello
> /home/cdr/mingtest/hello.exe: error while loading shared libraries:
> libgfortran-
> 3.dll: cannot open shared obj
On 2/7/2012 10:42 AM, marco atzeri wrote:
On 2/7/2012 5:13 PM, carolus wrote:
On 2/6/2012 5:05 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
The -mno-cygwin flag is still handled by gcc3, but that is deprecated
and may be removed at any time. The officially supported way to
build such apps is to use the approp
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 12:35:49PM -0600, Quinn Wood wrote:
>>...
>You may also have to change your code if it uses Unix features (an
>application I was recently using utilized mmap, which does not come
>with Windows.)
Please lets not have this discussion degrade into people discussing best
practi
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:42 AM, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 2/7/2012 5:13 PM, carolus wrote:
>> Is there an easy procedure that is equivalent
>> to the old -mno-cygwin (suitable for a dumb engineer who is not a
>> programmer and knows nothing about cross-compilation)? -mno-cygwin was a
>> very handy
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:13:49AM -0600, carolus wrote:
>On 2/6/2012 5:05 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>The -mno-cygwin flag is still handled by gcc3, but that is deprecated
>>and may be removed at any time. The officially supported way to build
>>such apps is to use the appropriate mingw or min
On 2/7/2012 5:13 PM, carolus wrote:
On 2/6/2012 5:05 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
The -mno-cygwin flag is still handled by gcc3, but that is deprecated
and may be removed at any time. The officially supported way to
build such apps is to use the appropriate mingw or mingw64
cross-compiler.
Is
On 2/6/2012 5:05 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
The -mno-cygwin flag is still handled by gcc3, but that is deprecated
and may be removed at any time. The officially supported way to
build such apps is to use the appropriate mingw or mingw64
cross-compiler.
Is there an easy procedure that is equ
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 04:08:21AM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 17:13 -0600, Quinn Wood wrote:
>> Thank you for the swift reply, and thanks for the information. This is
>> a tangential question, but are the MinGW files available for
>> integration with Cygwin suitable for
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
>
> The -mno-cygwin flag is still handled by gcc3, but that is deprecated
> and may be removed at any time. The officially supported way to build
> such apps is to use the appropriate mingw or mingw64 cross-compiler.
>
AIUI -mno-cygwin doesn't wor
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 17:13 -0600, Quinn Wood wrote:
> Thank you for the swift reply, and thanks for the information. This is
> a tangential question, but are the MinGW files available for
> integration with Cygwin suitable for this?
I'm not certain that I understand your question. There are seve
I apologize for the accidental use of your email address in the body
of that message.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
wrote:
> The -mno-cygwin flag is still handled by gcc3, but that is deprecated
> and may be removed at any time. The officially supported way to build
> such apps is to use the appropriate mingw or mingw64 cross-compiler.
>
>
> Yaakov
Thank you fo
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 16:27 -0600, Quinn Wood wrote:
> On the FAQ section 6.10 "How do I compile a Win32 executable that
> doesn't use Cygwin?" reads:
>
> "(Please note: This section has not yet been updated for the latest
> net release.)
>
> "The -mno-cygwin flag to gcc makes gcc link against st
On the FAQ section 6.10 "How do I compile a Win32 executable that
doesn't use Cygwin?" reads:
"(Please note: This section has not yet been updated for the latest
net release.)
"The -mno-cygwin flag to gcc makes gcc link against standard Microsoft
DLLs instead of Cygwin. This is desirable for nati
35 matches
Mail list logo
