On Mar 9 16:41, neo napster wrote:
> After goining through the code of shm.h and shm.c of Cygipc V1.09 that we are
> using,
> we have noticed that in function ShmCtl we have introduced logic to do the
> following:
>
> 1. Detach all PIDs from the passed Shared Memory Id.
> 2. Detach the PID of
After goining through the code of shm.h and shm.c of Cygipc V1.09 that we are
using,
we have noticed that in function ShmCtl we have introduced logic to do the
following:
1. Detach all PIDs from the passed Shared Memory Id.
2. Detach the PID of the process calling this function from
all the
On Mar 7 12:30, neo napster wrote:
> All,
>
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
> - Original Message
> From: Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Proje
cygwin@cygwin.com
Sent: Tuesday, 6 March, 2007 2:12:02 PM
Subject: Re: Difference Between CYGIPC And CYGServer
On Mar 6 10:46, neo napster wrote:
> When compiling we are getting the following error:
>
> apitest.c:28:31: ipc.h: No such file or directory
> apitest.c:29:31: shm.h: No such
On Mar 6 10:46, neo napster wrote:
> When compiling we are getting the following error:
>
> apitest.c:28:31: ipc.h: No such file or directory
> apitest.c:29:31: shm.h: No such file or directory
These files are under sys, so you have to include sys/ipc.h, sys/shm.h,
etc., as required by SUSv3.
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: cygwin cygwin
Sent: Monday, 5 March, 2007 7:51:45 PM
Subject: Re: Difference Between CYGIPC And CYGServer
On Mar 5 19:32, neo napster wrote:
> I have tried the suggested solution, but compilation failed as we have
> included
"compilation failed" is e
On Mar 5 19:32, neo napster wrote:
> I have tried the suggested solution, but compilation failed as we have
> included
"compilation failed" is everything but detailed enough to help.
> - Original Message
> From: Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQ
:39 PM
Subject: Re: Difference Between CYGIPC And CYGServer
neo napster wrote:
> I have a few queries regarding cygserver and cygipc.
> what will be the impact to move from cygipc to cygserver?
> I have some systems programs which make calls to the CYGIPC,
> since these programs a
> From: Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 2:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Difference Between CYGIPC And CYGServer
>
> On Mar 2 12:54, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > (In cygwin-1.7.0+, cygserver will also implement POSIX-compliant
> > shared memory objects and messag
On Mar 2 12:54, Charles Wilson wrote:
> (In cygwin-1.7.0+, cygserver will also implement
> POSIX-compliant shared memory objects and message queues).
Even better. POSIX shared memory objects and message queues are both
implemented using file backed sharead memory which works without help of
cy
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Charles Wilson wrote:
> neo napster wrote:
> > I have a few queries regarding cygserver and cygipc. what will be the
> > impact to move from cygipc to cygserver? I have some systems programs
> > which make calls to the CYGIPC, since these programs are coded long
> > back.
> >
>
neo napster wrote:
I have a few queries regarding cygserver and cygipc.
what will be the impact to move from cygipc to cygserver?
I have some systems programs which make calls to the CYGIPC,
since these programs are coded long back.
Can you please give us an idea of the things that need to be
Hi,
I have a few queries regarding cygserver and cygipc.
what will be the impact to move from cygipc to cygserver?
I have some systems programs which make calls to the CYGIPC,
since these programs are coded long back.
Can you please give us an idea of the things that need to be done
to move f
13 matches
Mail list logo
