Corrina Vinschen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's time to remove the CYGWIN=ntea setting from Cygwin.
> (see http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html)
>
> The reason is that it's just a fake. It fakes POSIX permission bits
> by using the "extended attributes" capability built into NTFS.
Hi Corinna,
On 01/03/07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 1 19:58, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> On 28/02/07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >I think it's time to remove the CYGWIN=ntea setting from Cygwin.
> >(see http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html)
>
> How will that affect
On Mar 1 19:58, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> On 28/02/07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >I think it's time to remove the CYGWIN=ntea setting from Cygwin.
> >(see http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html)
>
> How will that affect my system path variable, say 'CYGWIN=tty nontea
>
Hi Corinna,
On 28/02/07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I think it's time to remove the CYGWIN=ntea setting from Cygwin.
(see http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html)
How will that affect my system path variable, say 'CYGWIN=tty nontea
nosmbntsec nontsec'?
If so, please explain in a bit
Hi,
I think it's time to remove the CYGWIN=ntea setting from Cygwin.
(see http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html)
The reason is that it's just a fake. It fakes POSIX permission bits
by using the "extended attributes" capability built into NTFS. it
also works on FAT by creating a b
5 matches
Mail list logo