Re: DejaGnu package

2004-02-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 12:15:36AM +1100, Ben Elliston wrote: >Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>Do you want to be the cygwin DejaGNU maintainer? > >I guess -- is the existing maintainer not willing? > >>I don't have any plans for updating DejaGNU anytime soon. > >Why not? :-) Don'

Re: DejaGnu package

2004-02-20 Thread Ben Elliston
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you want to be the cygwin DejaGNU maintainer? I guess -- is the existing maintainer not willing? > I don't have any plans for updating DejaGNU anytime soon. Why not? :-) Cheers, Ben -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe

Re: DejaGnu package

2004-02-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:33:32AM +1100, Ben Elliston wrote: >I see that the Dejagnu package in Cygwin is a snapshot and not a >formal release. DejaGnu 1.4.4 was released a couple of weeks ago and >should work fine on Cygwin. Can the package maintainer do the deed? Do you want to be t

DejaGnu package

2004-02-16 Thread Ben Elliston
Hi I see that the Dejagnu package in Cygwin is a snapshot and not a formal release. DejaGnu 1.4.4 was released a couple of weeks ago and should work fine on Cygwin. Can the package maintainer do the deed? Cheers, Ben -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem