: cygwin-list
Subject: Re: Cygwin vs: Windoze services for Unix
The interix subsystem isn't as flexible as cygwin IMHO.
The useful bits are the NFS utilities which do not have source &
password synchronization which has source for *nix (not GPL).
terry wrote:
> I just received an evaluati
The interix subsystem isn't as flexible as cygwin IMHO.
The useful bits are the NFS utilities which do not have source &
password synchronization which has source for *nix (not GPL).
terry wrote:
I just received an evaluation copy with Linux Magazine as was
wondering if this is a direct 'compet
Windows Services for Unix does not get updated very often, if ever. If
you phone microsoft about it they say it is just for migrating old unix
software to a windows environment.
terry wrote:
I just received an evaluation copy with Linux Magazine as was
wondering if this is a direct 'competit
I just received an evaluation copy with Linux Magazine as was wondering
if this is a direct 'competitive' product to Cygwin, and if so, what are
the significant functional differences (other than the obvious - not
being open source / free software and Cygwin being higher quality, of
course ;>).
4 matches
Mail list logo
