On Jan 4 15:25, Markus Leuthold wrote:
> On Jul 5 10:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Jul 5 12:21, Bill Metzenthen wrote:
> >> What should I ask the system administrator to change so that cygwin
> >> will once again work on this drive? Perhaps there is some new setting
> >> (or an old one whic
On Jul 5 10:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 5 12:21, Bill Metzenthen wrote:
> What should I ask the system administrator to change so that cygwin
> will once again work on this drive? Perhaps there is some new setting
> (or an old one which has somehow changed) for cygwin that I have
> fail
On Oct 21 12:32, gds wrote:
>
> If I do chmod 000 testfile I see with ls -l:
> -r--r--r--
> If I do chmod 777 testfile I see
> -rw-r--r--
> So there is a small effect but not much.
In noacl mode or on file systems not supporting ACLs (FAT, for instance)
permissions are emulated using the DOS R/O
On 10/21/2011 10:39 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 21 10:16, gds wrote:
On 10/21/2011 06:55 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
On Friday, October 21, 2011 10:50 AM
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lem
On October 21, 2011 4:36 PM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Oct 21 16:13, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
>> On October 21, 2011 12:55 PM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
>> >> This is by design here. IT wants it that way.
>> >
>> >Then "noacl' is the on
On Oct 21 10:16, gds wrote:
> On 10/21/2011 06:55 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
> >>On Friday, October 21, 2011 10:50 AM
> >>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>>
> >>>On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wro
On Oct 21 16:13, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
> On October 21, 2011 12:55 PM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
> >> This is by design here. IT wants it that way.
> >
> >Then "noacl' is the only way for you.
>
> Unless I wait for the next release, r
On 10/21/2011 06:55 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
On Friday, October 21, 2011 10:50 AM
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
I know this an old thread but I am in exactly
On October 21, 2011 12:55 PM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
>> On Friday, October 21, 2011 10:50 AM
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >
>> >On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
>> >> On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >I k
On Oct 21 12:15, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
> On Friday, October 21, 2011 10:50 AM
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> >On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
> >> On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >I know this an old thread but I am in exactly the same situation as
On Friday, October 21, 2011 10:50 AM
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
>> On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >I know this an old thread but I am in exactly the same situation as
>> >the OP. Access with 1.7.7 and before worked fine, 1.7.9 has t
On Oct 20 18:58, gds wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
>
> >
> >I know this an old thread but I am in exactly the same situation as
> >the OP. Access with 1.7.7 and before worked fine, 1.7.9 has this
> >problem. The workaround with explicit noacl option works for
On 10/18/2011 08:52 AM, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
I know this an old thread but I am in exactly the same situation as
the OP. Access with 1.7.7 and before worked fine, 1.7.9 has this
problem. The workaround with explicit noacl option works for me but
it is rather awkward as I have to w
On Jul 5 10:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jul 5 12:21, Bill Metzenthen wrote:
>> I have problems with permissions on a network drive. The drive is
>> maintained by others and I have no control over the Windows
>> permissions of the drive.
>> [...]
>> If I now try to use cygwin to create anyth
On 8/2/2011 12:10 PM, spamboun...@gmx.de wrote:
On Jul 6 11:43, Bill Metzenthen wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
If I now try to use cygwin to create anything then it fails (despite
it reporting that I have rwx permissions for the directory):
For now, set the mount point for this drive to "noa
> On Jul 6 11:43, Bill Metzenthen wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >> If I now try to use cygwin to create anything then it fails (despite
> > >> it reporting that I have rwx permissions for the directory):
> > >
> > > For now, set the mount point for this drive to "noacl". If you're
> > >
On Jul 6 11:43, Bill Metzenthen wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> If I now try to use cygwin to create anything then it fails (despite
> >> it reporting that I have rwx permissions for the directory):
> >
> > For now, set the mount point for this drive to "noacl". If you're
> > accessing the
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> If I now try to use cygwin to create anything then it fails (despite
>> it reporting that I have rwx permissions for the directory):
>
> For now, set the mount point for this drive to "noacl". If you're
> accessing the share via /cygdrive, create a distinct mount point f
On Jul 5 10:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 5 12:21, Bill Metzenthen wrote:
> > What should I ask the system administrator to change so that cygwin
> > will once again work on this drive? Perhaps there is some new setting
> > (or an old one which has somehow changed) for cygwin that I have
On Jul 5 12:21, Bill Metzenthen wrote:
> I have problems with permissions on a network drive. The drive is
> maintained by others and I have no control over the Windows
> permissions of the drive.
> [...]
> If I now try to use cygwin to create anything then it fails (despite
> it reporting that I
I have problems with permissions on a network drive. The drive is
maintained by others and I have no control over the Windows
permissions of the drive.
I have a directory on the drive and I can use Windows Explorer to
create and write files and subdirectories to it. I can also use the
Windows 'm
At 04:21 AM 8/11/2004, you wrote:
>> You do that by creating the directory you want to install
>> Cygwin to and setting the permissions, via Windows, before
>> Cygwin installation, making sure to set the permissions so
>> they are inherited.
>
>Ah. Then if I understand things correctly, I could pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Larry Hall wrote:
> Fish wrote:
> > Could some kind soul out there help me to understand why
> > *SOME* type of "public" permissions set is [apparently]
> > required by Cygwin? (*nix?)
> >
> > Thanks.
>
>
> I thought Pierre did a rather good (goo
At 10:19 PM 8/10/2004, you wrote:
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>(Ref: original "Cygwin permissions problem" and related threads)
>
>FYI: I managed to resolve my issue by completely re-installing Cygwin
>from scratch after having add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(Ref: original "Cygwin permissions problem" and related threads)
FYI: I managed to resolve my issue by completely re-installing Cygwin
from scratch after having added (and allowing to propagate) the
"Everyone" group (Read and
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 11:04:43PM -0700, Fish wrote:
>
> Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>
> > setup is a Windows program. The files it creates have
> > the inheritable permissions of the parent directory.
>
> Well then it must not be setup that's doing it then.
Right. Thanks for the cacls info. Wha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fish wrote:
> Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> > In your case, it looks like some directories (like /bin)
> > have OK inheritable permissions, while others (like /etc)
> > don't.
>
> Yep. :(
Addt'l info:
cacls o/p of c:\cygwin\bin\*.* attached.
Not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> setup is a Windows program. The files it creates have
> the inheritable permissions of the parent directory.
Well then it must not be setup that's doing it then.
But I think it's obvious that *some* program *somewhere*
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 03:09:44PM -0700, Fish wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I (Fish) wrote:
>
> > Just thought I'd throw this into the mix too in case it might help:
> >
> >
> > I *do* have Microsoft's "Virtual PC" product installed on my system
> > (and alr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I (Fish) wrote:
> Just thought I'd throw this into the mix too in case it might help:
>
>
> I *do* have Microsoft's "Virtual PC" product installed on my system
> (and already have a couple of test Windows 2000 systems setup under
> it), so if the
30 matches
Mail list logo
