waterlan schreef op 2014-04-25 00:10:
waterlan schreef op 2014-04-24 21:43:
Chris J. Breisch schreef op 2014-04-17 20:32:
Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Hi,
The major linux distributions have switched for their man system to
'man-db' (http://man-db.nongnu.org/) in favour of the classic man.
I thin
waterlan wrote:
I must have done something wrong in the build before I sent this.
Re-building libpipeline does cause 'make check' to execute the tests.
I got one failure. I've talked to the owner of the project, and he's
sent me a patch that does eliminate the failure. So I now have a
libpipelin
waterlan schreef op 2014-04-24 21:43:
Chris J. Breisch schreef op 2014-04-17 20:32:
Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Hi,
The major linux distributions have switched for their man system to
'man-db' (http://man-db.nongnu.org/) in favour of the classic man.
I think that Cygwin should also switch to man
Chris J. Breisch schreef op 2014-04-17 20:32:
Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Hi,
The major linux distributions have switched for their man system to
'man-db' (http://man-db.nongnu.org/) in favour of the classic man.
I think that Cygwin should also switch to man-db. man-db is much
better
in handlin
Chris J. Breisch schreef op 2014-04-23 17:18:
Chris J. Breisch wrote:
Check-0.9.12 seems to work out-of-the-box. Configure with
--prefix=/usr.
"make check" on check reports all tests passed, despite what appear to
be some failures. The CHANGELOG says that this version should pass all
tests o
Chris J. Breisch wrote:
Check-0.9.12 seems to work out-of-the-box. Configure with --prefix=/usr.
"make check" on check reports all tests passed, despite what appear to
be some failures. The CHANGELOG says that this version should pass all
tests on Cygwin. I've just subscribed to the mailing lis
Hi,
sorry for METOO(tm) notice.
but check-0.9.10 is totally broken on cygwin.
http://sourceforge.net/p/check/bugs/88/
one of following should apply ASAP IMHO.
* remove 0.9.10 and stick 0.9.8
* remove 0.9.10 and bump 0.9.11 or later
Peace,
2014-04-22 5:41 GMT+09:00 waterlan :
> Chris J. Bre
Chris J. Breisch schreef op 2014-04-17 20:32:
Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Hi,
The major linux distributions have switched for their man system to
'man-db' (http://man-db.nongnu.org/) in favour of the classic man.
I think that Cygwin should also switch to man-db. man-db is much
better
in handlin
op 17-04-14 20:32, Chris J. Breisch schreef:
Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Hi,
The major linux distributions have switched for their man system to
'man-db' (http://man-db.nongnu.org/) in favour of the classic man.
I think that Cygwin should also switch to man-db. man-db is much better
in handling
Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Hi,
The major linux distributions have switched for their man system to
'man-db' (http://man-db.nongnu.org/) in favour of the classic man.
I think that Cygwin should also switch to man-db. man-db is much better
in handling man pages in different encoding.
Before man-db
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The "relocation truncated to fit" gcc error message on 64 bit systems is
a red herring. It's in fact just what it says, there's an undefined
symbol. Off the top of my head I don't know where ck_assert_failed is
defined, probably some library, but the leading underscore i
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 14 10:24, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
I downloaded and built the latest version of check, and it seems to
work much better. I still have issues with libpipelines tests. It
appears that there is a 32/64-bit issue somewhere. I'm using Cygwin
x64. Many of the tests fail w
On Mar 14 10:24, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
> Erwin Waterlander wrote:
> >Op 14-3-2014 13:58 Chris J. Breisch schreef:
> >>
> >>
> >>There's also a check 0.9.12 from January of this year.
> >>
> >>It appears to me that we should upgrade check to at least 0.9.11, as
> >>I'm unconvinced that the current
Op 14-3-2014 15:24 Chris J. Breisch schreef:
Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Op 14-3-2014 13:58 Chris J. Breisch schreef:
There's also a check 0.9.12 from January of this year.
It appears to me that we should upgrade check to at least 0.9.11, as
I'm unconvinced that the current version is working.
Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Op 14-3-2014 13:58 Chris J. Breisch schreef:
There's also a check 0.9.12 from January of this year.
It appears to me that we should upgrade check to at least 0.9.11, as
I'm unconvinced that the current version is working.
It was in October when I tried. I also coul
Op 14-3-2014 13:58 Chris J. Breisch schreef:
Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Hi,
The major linux distributions have switched for their man system to
'man-db' (http://man-db.nongnu.org/) in favour of the classic man.
I think that Cygwin should also switch to man-db. man-db is much better
in handling m
Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Hi,
The major linux distributions have switched for their man system to
'man-db' (http://man-db.nongnu.org/) in favour of the classic man.
I think that Cygwin should also switch to man-db. man-db is much better
in handling man pages in different encoding.
Before man-db
Hi,
The major linux distributions have switched for their man system to
'man-db' (http://man-db.nongnu.org/) in favour of the classic man.
I think that Cygwin should also switch to man-db. man-db is much better
in handling man pages in different encoding.
Before man-db, libpipeline (http://
18 matches
Mail list logo
