Re: Messages not delivered to the cygwin@ mailing list

Greetings, Ernie Rael! > On 23/09/15 1:59 PM, Andrey Repin via Cygwin wrote: >> Greetings, cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com! >> >> It is about 4 months since I lost ability to post to the many mailing lists >> from my primary address. Messages are seemingly coming into a blackhole - no >> responses, no rej

Re: Messages not delivered to the cygwin@ mailing list

On 2023-09-15 14:59, Andrey Repin via Cygwin wrote: It is about 4 months since I lost ability to post to the many mailing lists from my primary address. Messages are seemingly coming into a blackhole - no responses, no rejections, nada. The subscription is working, I'm receiving all mails that ar

Re: Messages not delivered to the cygwin@ mailing list

On 23/09/15 1:59 PM, Andrey Repin via Cygwin wrote: Greetings, cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com! It is about 4 months since I lost ability to post to the many mailing lists from my primary address. Messages are seemingly coming into a blackhole - no responses, no rejections, nada. The subscription is wor

Unsubscribing from Cygwin Mailing List (was: iswcntrl() regression)

On 2019-01-08 15:56, Wong, Samuel wrote: > I have tried to unsubscribe from the Cygwin mailing list. > I have tried simple way to unsubscribe by entering Mailing list name, Your > email address. But I cannot find out the mailing list name. > I have read the unsubscribe full, but still

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

On Jan 28 11:43, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > It has the unfortunate side-effect that downgrading packages is not > > possible anymore, and worse, the package could be silently removed. > > That's a teeny little bit more exciting action than I anticipated with > >

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > It has the unfortunate side-effect that downgrading packages is not > possible anymore, and worse, the package could be silently removed. > That's a teeny little bit more exciting action than I anticipated with > my change. With your second patch the orphan

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

On Jan 27 16:55, Warren Young wrote: > On Jan 27, 2015, at 7:07 AM, Andrey Repin wrote: > > >>> On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote: > >>>> Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not > >>>> supposed to read): > >>> &g

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

On Jan 27, 2015, at 7:07 AM, Andrey Repin wrote: >>> On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote: >>>> Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not >>>> supposed to read): >>> >>> Haha. The cygwin-apps list is publically archiv

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

On 1/27/2015 5:51 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: Greetings, Marco Atzeri! PS: the cygwin web site seems very slow. Is it just my connection ? HTTP or HTTPS? It seems, the HTTPS part sometimes bugs out. both, but now is OK -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdae...@yandex.ru) 27.01.2015, <19:50> Regards

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

Greetings, Marco Atzeri! > PS: the cygwin web site seems very slow. Is it just my connection ? HTTP or HTTPS? It seems, the HTTPS part sometimes bugs out. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdae...@yandex.ru) 27.01.2015, <19:50> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.c

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

On Jan 27 10:24, Vince Rice wrote: > > PS: the cygwin web site seems very slow. Is it just my connection ? > > What he said. It’s been off and on for a couple of weeks, but this > morning it actually timed out. I actually did a traceroute and it was > a 70.* address that was the problem. (Sorry, I

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

On 1/27/2015 5:24 PM, Vince Rice wrote: PS: the cygwin web site seems very slow. Is it just my connection ? What he said. It’s been off and on for a couple of weeks, but this morning it actually timed out. I actually did a traceroute and it was a 70.* address that was the problem. (Sorry, I d

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

> PS: the cygwin web site seems very slow. Is it just my connection ? What he said. It’s been off and on for a couple of weeks, but this morning it actually timed out. I actually did a traceroute and it was a 70.* address that was the problem. (Sorry, I did it at home and don’t have the output w

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

On 1/27/2015 1:17 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote: Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not supposed to read): Which I did. Satisfied user here. An user which never uses the keep/current/experimental radio buttons, though (which I consider

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

> > One detail bugging me (and probably others as well) in Setup is this. > > If I chose to install a test version of a package, and then start Setup > > again, Setup will default to the current version of the package again. > > If I'm just a bit careless, I'll overwrite my test version with the cu

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

On Jan 27 17:05, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! > > >> Which I did. Satisfied user here. An user which never uses the > >> keep/current/experimental radio buttons, though (which I consider > >> superfluous). > > > Thanks for testing, and that's a good point. These radio butto

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

Greetings, Houder! >> On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote: >>> Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not >>> supposed to read): >> >> Haha. The cygwin-apps list is publically archived for a reason :) > Yes, I know ... making fun. >

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! >> Which I did. Satisfied user here. An user which never uses the >> keep/current/experimental radio buttons, though (which I consider >> superfluous). > Thanks for testing, and that's a good point. These radio buttons > are rather... weird. I think it might be a go

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

On Jan 27 14:16, Houder wrote: > > On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote: > >> Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not > >> supposed to read): > > > > Haha. The cygwin-apps list is publically archived for a reason :) > > Yes, I know .

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

> On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote: >> Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not >> supposed to read): > > Haha. The cygwin-apps list is publically archived for a reason :) Yes, I know ... making fun. However, as I have NOT seen any maintainer respond

Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote: > Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not > supposed to read): Haha. The cygwin-apps list is publically archived for a reason :) > Title: Setup patch to keep test version if test version installed > > > Hi guys, >

Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...

Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not supposed to read): Title: Setup patch to keep test version if test version installed > Hi guys, > > I need a bit of feedback. > > One detail bugging me (and probably others as well) in Setup is this. > If I

[HEADSUP] WHAT TO DO IF I CAN'T SEND MAILS TO A CYGWIN MAILING LIST

[DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MAIL!] Now and in future, if anybody has *any* problem sending a mail to any of the Cygwin mailing lists, please send a mail to +--+ | postmaster AT sourceware DOT org | +--+ If you got a bounce, read t

Re: Suggestion for Cygwin mailing list handling

On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:37:50PM -0700, Mark Geisert wrote: >O powers that be, >Would it be possible to have the mailing list software reject emails >containing appended (i.e., not attached) cygcheck output? And/or bounce >such emails back to their senders? No. cgf -- Unsubscribe info:

Suggestion for Cygwin mailing list handling

O powers that be, Would it be possible to have the mailing list software reject emails containing appended (i.e., not attached) cygcheck output? And/or bounce such emails back to their senders? Another theoretical option would be to automatically convert appended cygcheck output to an attachm

Re: I would like to join Cygwin mailing list

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Srinivasan Rajesh on 4/13/2006 2:03 AM: > I would like to join CYGWIN mailing list. As I go through the FAQ, > documentation and guidelines for sending mail, but i couldn't find where > to sign up, how to post questions, e

I would like to join Cygwin mailing list

I would like to join CYGWIN mailing list. As I go through the FAQ, documentation and guidelines for sending mail, but i couldn't find where to sign up, how to post questions, etc., Will you please guide me on doing the

fork errors - search snips from cygwin mailing list archive

I egreped thru (my local copy of) the cygwin archives back to ~3/2005 for: fork: No such file or directory died waiting for longjmp fork: Bad file fork: Resource temporarily unavai Please see end of this post for snips from this grep. The results suggest a fair number of users had the pro

Re: Cannot send *.zip attachement to cygwin mailing list

At 05:35 PM 8/20/2004, you wrote: >I've tried to send mail with *.zip attachement to cygwin mailing list, >but got this error: > >> Subject: failure notice >> >> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at home.pl. >> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver

Cannot send *.zip attachement to cygwin mailing list

I've tried to send mail with *.zip attachement to cygwin mailing list, but got this error: > Subject: failure notice > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at home.pl. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. > This is a permane

Re: Cygwin mailing list message 94978

Yea. I did the request. It never came through and probably just bounced again. Anyways thanks. On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:33:57 -0400, Larry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 06:19 PM 8/9/2004, you wrote > >Thanks. It was just that I got an automated message originating from > >the mailing list

Re: Cygwin mailing list message 94978

Thanks. It was just that I got an automated message originating from the mailing list bot that a message was bounced back that originated from this mailing list. I just needed to know if someone was posting something important. On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 17:16:09 -0400, Larry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: Cygwin mailing list message 94978

At 04:56 PM 8/9/2004, you wrote: >Could someone retrieve this and tell me what the contents were? Thanks. You can always check the email archives if you need to know this kind of stuff and can't for some reason get it on your own. You'll be real sorry you missed this one. ;-)

RE: Cygwin mailing list message 94978

>Could someone retrieve this and tell me what the contents were? Thanks. You can get it yourself by sending to cygwin DASH get DOT 94978 AT cygwin DOT COM but all you'll find is that it was a virus-laden email, or that somebody was reporting Same message is here: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin

Cygwin mailing list message 94978

Could someone retrieve this and tell me what the contents were? Thanks. -- Robert Pendell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ:

Re: announce -> cygwin mailing list gateway broken

;ve broken the announce -> > >> > cygwin mailing list gateway which used to run from my computer. So you > >> > won't be seeing announcements here for a while. > >> >[snip] > >> > In the meantime, if someone wants to volunteer to relay this b

Re: announce -> cygwin mailing list gateway broken

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I should have posted this before. > > Here's my procmail rule, fwiw: > > * ^Sender: cygwin-announce-owner-HAT-cygwin.* > { > :0c > /var/spool/mail/cygwin-announce > > :0c > /home/cgf/mail/cygwin-announce > > S

Re: announce -> cygwin mailing list gateway broken

m here and I've broken the announce -> >>> > cygwin mailing list gateway which used to run from my computer. So you >>> > won't be seeing announcements here for a while. >>> > >>> > I'm looking to implement a more robust method for doi

Re: announce -> cygwin mailing list gateway broken

On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 06:19:17PM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: >On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Brian Ford wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> > I've been changing my email system here and I've broken the announce -> >> > cygwin mailing list ga

Re: announce -> cygwin mailing list gateway broken

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Brian Ford wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > I've been changing my email system here and I've broken the announce -> > > cygwin mailing list gateway which used to run from my computer. So you > > won't b

announce -> cygwin mailing list gateway broken

I've been changing my email system here and I've broken the announce -> cygwin mailing list gateway which used to run from my computer. So you won't be seeing announcements here for a while. I'm looking to implement a more robust method for doing this that doesn't rel

Re: Cygwin Mailing list

utomo wrote: > I can catagorize my email using [EMAIL PROTECTED] as rules. But it is a > suggestions. > In many mailing list (I guess more than 70%) they use a subject as > indicator. I think it also one of the good way to do. We did not need to > be a different, or do somethings which others did

RE: cygwin Mailing list

> Sent: 17 February 2004 16:00 From: Christopher Faylor ..snip.. > >> cygwin is not for newbies. (*evil grin*). > > > >Ooh, ooh, have we got ourselves a new catchphrase here? > CGF? Maybe even > >an acronym: "CINFN"? :-) > > Sounds good to me. Even though it's not true. I'd say that > most o

Re: cygwin Mailing list

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:51:43AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> Now if you just think of "quality" of posts where just is said "This has >> been discussed, search archives". Well if bother to reply at all, why >> not bring some content, e.g. title of thread that discussion were. Oh >> wait...

Re: cygwin Mailing list

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:35:24AM +0700, utomo wrote: >In many mailing list (I guess more than 70%) they use a subject as >indicator. I think it also one of the good way to do. We did not need >to be a different, or do somethings which others did not do. Actually, we need to do what I decide to

Re: Cygwin Mailing list

epeat over and over without any attempts to search the archives. I wouldn't call this a flaw, though. I also wouldn't call those queries "stupid" -- just sent off without thinking. > > As a "casual" reader of the cygwin mailing list, I feel there has been &g

RE: Cygwin Mailing list

> While I do not claim any kind of authority, could I suggest perhaps a) > being a little nicer to newbies (it isn't that hard really) and b) if > you feel the need for a post without any useful content (perhaps just > saying "search the archives") to send it just to the author of the mail > in que

Re: Cygwin Mailing list

ts. This is not unique feature, it happens everywhere where lifespan of list grows, people come and go, but that small, set of people - the core, stays same from year to year. People just get overwhelmed with "stupid" questions. As a "casual" reader of the cygwin mailing list, I

Re: Cygwin Mailing list

ct line of this email, you don't even need to check the mailing list archives to work out the previous answer! Gareth I apologise for replying to this, but I feel I must. As a "casual" reader of the cygwin mailing list, I feel there has been an increasing number of mails sent

RE: Cygwin Mailing list

10:52 AM > To: utomo; 'Cygwin List' > Subject: RE: Cygwin Mailing list > > > Hi Utomo, > > Actually, this and many other arguments have already been > made and refuted > in previous rounds of discussion on this subject. I think > everyone here would app

RE: Cygwin Mailing list

--- Larry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Utomo, > > Actually, this and many other arguments have already been made and refuted > in previous rounds of discussion on this subject. I think everyone here > would appreciate it if you would review the old threads so that you don't > rehash th

RE: Cygwin Mailing list

gt; > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Hall >> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:15 AM >> To: utomo; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: Cygwin Mailing list >> >> >> At 09:

RE: Cygwin Mailing list

. Regards, Utomo > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Hall > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:15 AM > To: utomo; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Cygwin Mailing list > > > At 09:55 PM 2/16/2004, utomo

RE: Cygwin Mailing list

> > Hi, > > I suggest that cygwin mailing list add in the subject "(Cygwin)", so we > can easily identify and manage the mails which coming from cygwin > mailing list. As obviously you're a mailing list professional, I'm sure you checked the mailing list

Re: Cygwin Mailing list

At 09:55 PM 2/16/2004, utomo you wrote: >Hi, > >I suggest that cygwin mailing list add in the subject "(Cygwin)", so we >can easily identify and manage the mails which coming from cygwin >mailing list. Since this "suggestion" is made every once in a blue mo

Cygwin Mailing list

Hi, I suggest that cygwin mailing list add in the subject "(Cygwin)", so we can easily identify and manage the mails which coming from cygwin mailing list. Thanks, Utomo -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://

Re: Cygwin mailing list post "Re: Cannot delete shortcuts under windows XP"

Paul, All Cygwin-related queries should go to the Cygwin mailing list. Not only will it give you access to more expertise than any one person can provide, it also puts your question and any answers to it in the archives which, as you discovered already, can be used by others with similar

Re: Need Mail headers (was Re: posts to cygwin mailing list alwayscomes...)

> > > > Starting today, everytime I post to cygwin, I receive the following message > > > > below. I'm not sending to netlibd nor am I a member > > of > > > > the netlibd mailing list. There is a reference to some sort of this problem > > > > last week > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygw

Need Mail headers (was Re: posts to cygwin mailing list alwayscomes...)

On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Carlo Florendo wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Brian Dessent" > > > > Carlo Florendo wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Starting today, everytime I post to cygwin, I receive the following message > > > below. I'm not sending to netlibd nor am I a member >

Re: posts to cygwin mailing list always comes with a reply from another address

- Original Message - From: "Brian Dessent" > Carlo Florendo wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Starting today, everytime I post to cygwin, I receive the following message below. > > I'm not sending to netlibd nor am I a member of > > the netlibd mailing list. There is a reference to some s

Re: posts to cygwin mailing list always comes with a reply from another address

Carlo Florendo wrote: > > Hello, > > Starting today, everytime I post to cygwin, I receive the following message below. > I'm not sending to netlibd nor am I a member of > the netlibd mailing list. There is a reference to some sort of this problem last > week > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cy

posts to cygwin mailing list always comes with a reply from another address

Hello, Starting today, everytime I post to cygwin, I receive the following message below. I'm not sending to netlibd nor am I a member of the netlibd mailing list. There is a reference to some sort of this problem last week http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-06/msg01329.html but I got no