- Original Message -
From: "Eric Blake"
On 01/04/2011 12:01 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
It really feels like so called consistency is being enforced over
functionality which is sad as I always though cygwin's goal was to make
Unix look and feel under windows?
With the Unix look and feel
On 01/04/2011 12:01 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> It really feels like so called consistency is being enforced over
> functionality
> which is sad as I always though cygwin's goal was to make Unix look and
> feel
> under windows?
With the Unix look and feel, do you type 'ls file' or 'ls.exe file'?
- Original Message -
From: "David Mastronarde"
You CAN'T have a directory and an executable sharing the same name on
Linux, so why should you try the same thing on cygwin? Given that
cygwin attempts to handle '.exe' as a necessary evil, and tries to
recognize executables when the suff
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, David Mastronarde wrote:
When there is a directory and an executable with the same name, mv adds
.exe when renaming the directory:
% mkdir test2
% cd test2
% mkdir package-3.1.1
% touch package-3.1.1.exe
% mv package-3.1.1 packag
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, David Mastronarde wrote:
>
> When there is a directory and an executable with the same name, mv adds
> .exe when renaming the directory:
>
> % mkdir test2
> % cd test2
> % mkdir package-3.1.1
> % touch package-3.1.1.exe
> % mv package-3.1.1 package-3.1.2
> % ls
> package-3
5 matches
Mail list logo