Re: Bug in dumper

2003-03-01 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
Just to set the record straight: none of the text I wrote is still in the mail below - yet my name is? Anyways, dumper works fine for me (on an NT/4 box with all the latest), which is what I told the original poster. I also told him to take a closer look at the exit code of dumper. I just don't

Re: Bug in dumper

2003-02-28 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:50:00PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:10:25AM +0300, Egor Duda wrote: >>This means that either i'm wrong about my assumptions about >>bfd_set_arch_mach() and its return, or there's a bug in binutils. It >>should be quite easy to debug, tho

Re: Bug in dumper

2003-02-28 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:10:25AM +0300, Egor Duda wrote: >This means that either i'm wrong about my assumptions about >bfd_set_arch_mach() and its return, or there's a bug in binutils. It >should be quite easy to debug, though, for those who have a cygwin >toolchain installed. Just build dumpe

Re: Bug in dumper

2003-02-28 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:10:25AM +0300, Egor Duda wrote: >Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: >>>Does dumper.exe work? > >Well, i should have answered this, but unfortunately, i have no access >to windows machine right now to debug, or even verify this. > >>>Upon execution I see the following in the

Bug in dumper

2003-02-27 Thread Egor Duda
Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: Does dumper.exe work? Well, i should have answered this, but unfortunately, i have no access to windows machine right now to debug, or even verify this. Upon execution I see the following in the cygwin console: $ ./div.exe 7 [main] div 2296 handle_exceptions