Just to set the record straight: none of the text I wrote is still in the
mail below - yet my name is?
Anyways, dumper works fine for me (on an NT/4 box with all the latest),
which is what I told the original poster. I also told him to take a closer
look at the exit code of dumper.
I just don't
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:50:00PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:10:25AM +0300, Egor Duda wrote:
>>This means that either i'm wrong about my assumptions about
>>bfd_set_arch_mach() and its return, or there's a bug in binutils. It
>>should be quite easy to debug, tho
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:10:25AM +0300, Egor Duda wrote:
>This means that either i'm wrong about my assumptions about
>bfd_set_arch_mach() and its return, or there's a bug in binutils. It
>should be quite easy to debug, though, for those who have a cygwin
>toolchain installed. Just build dumpe
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:10:25AM +0300, Egor Duda wrote:
>Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
>>>Does dumper.exe work?
>
>Well, i should have answered this, but unfortunately, i have no access
>to windows machine right now to debug, or even verify this.
>
>>>Upon execution I see the following in the
Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
Does dumper.exe work?
Well, i should have answered this, but unfortunately, i have no access
to windows machine right now to debug, or even verify this.
Upon execution I see the following in the cygwin console:
$ ./div.exe
7 [main] div 2296 handle_exceptions
5 matches
Mail list logo