On Oct 28 17:20, Brian Inglis wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> > On Oct 26 19:16, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > > Sorry - redo with the file existing!
> >
> > No worries, I applied your other patch since it also cleaned up some
> > whitespaces and, for some reason, the below patch didn't
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
>
> On Oct 26 19:16, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > On 2015-10-26 11:34, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > >Third time lucky - pasting inline into email and resending to all
previous lists.
> > >
> > >Please note that conversion into too-small buffer size in regression
test m
On Oct 26 19:16, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2015-10-26 11:34, Brian Inglis wrote:
> >Third time lucky - pasting inline into email and resending to all previous
> >lists.
> >
> >Please note that conversion into too-small buffer size in regression test
> >may not have expected result!
> >
> >Tried to
Forwarded Message
Subject: Fwd: Re: Bash unable to print epoch timestamp
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:32:44 -0600
From: Brian Inglis
Reply-To: brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca
Organisation: Systematic Software
To: corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com
Already forwarded as below to cygwin and
Corinna Vinschen writes:
>
> Brian, ping?
Hi Corinna,
Just sent third try to this list, -patches, and yourself:
May have been blocked because thunderbird decided to base64 encode the stc
attachment ("smart" attachments?) whereas the patch was inlined properly!
Note in latest attempt:
"Third ti
.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Fwd: Re: Bash unable to print epoch timestamp
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:32:44 -0600
From: Brian Inglis
Reply-To: brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca
Organisation: Systematic Software
To: corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com
Already forwarded as below to cygwin and
Brian, ping?
On Oct 22 10:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On Oct 22 07:03, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > Brian Inglis SystematicSw.ab.ca> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > Don Harrop effx.us> writes:
> > > > Bash outputs no value when using it's built in method of printing an
> > > > "epoch" tim
Hi Brian,
On Oct 22 07:03, Brian Inglis wrote:
> Brian Inglis SystematicSw.ab.ca> writes:
>
> >
> > Don Harrop effx.us> writes:
> > > Bash outputs no value when using it's built in method of printing an
> > > "epoch" timestamp.
> > > BashCommandLine#: printf '%(%s)T' -1
> >
> > bash printf d
Brian Inglis SystematicSw.ab.ca> writes:
>
> Don Harrop effx.us> writes:
> > Bash outputs no value when using it's built in method of printing an
> > "epoch" timestamp.
> > BashCommandLine#: printf '%(%s)T' -1
>
> bash printf depends on underlying strftime in newlib, which does not support
>
Don Harrop effx.us> writes:
> Bash outputs no value when using it's built in method of printing an
> "epoch" timestamp.
> BashCommandLine#: printf '%(%s)T' -1
bash printf depends on underlying strftime in newlib, which does not support
%s, as it is conditional on _WANT_C99_TIME_FORMATS being def
Bash outputs no value when using it's built in method of printing an
"epoch" timestamp.
BashCommandLine#: printf '%(%s)T' -1
I've verified the same behavior with others on IRC.
Below are my relevant pieces of cygcheck.exe -s
Windows 7 Enterprise Ver 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1
Cygwin DLL v
11 matches
Mail list logo