Re: IDP.Generic virus reported in okular.exe, attention: Yaakov Selkowitz

Hi, Not sure how and where do you look, but Google gave me this https://www.avg.com/en-us/false-positive-file-form Please file the report there On Sat, Sep 7, 2019, 11:25 PM Alan Thwaits wrote: > Dear Cygwin community, > > I have looked and looked. I cannot find an appropriate place to report

Re: IDP.Generic virus reported in okular.exe, attention: Yaakov Selkowitz

Dear Cygwin community, I have looked and looked. I cannot find an appropriate place to report viruses. I know of two viruses, and I would like to report them. Sincerely, Alan On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 8:20 AM Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Alan Thwaits! > > > Dear Yaakov or other interested m

Re: IDP.Generic virus reported in okular.exe, attention: Yaakov Selkowitz

Greetings, Alan Thwaits! > Dear Yaakov or other interested maintainer: > When I ran the program okular.exe under bash and xterm, my antivirus > program AVG Antivirus Free quarantined the program and reported that it > contains the virus IDP.Generic. > I hope that you find this helpful. Why do y

IDP.Generic virus reported in okular.exe, attention: Yaakov Selkowitz

Dear Yaakov or other interested maintainer: When I ran the program okular.exe under bash and xterm, my antivirus program AVG Antivirus Free quarantined the program and reported that it contains the virus IDP.Generic. I hope that you find this helpful. Best regards, Alan -- Problem reports:

Attention || E-mail Disable Warning

Dear cygwin@cygwin.com, We received a request on 21/3/08 to deactivate your account. Please confirm this request to complete the deactivation process: Yes, I would like to deactivate my account No i didn't make this request, cancel deactivation request Thank you, -- Proble

Attention || E-mail Disable Warning

Dear cygwin@cygwin.com, We received a request on 21/3/08 to deactivate your account. Please confirm this request to complete the deactivation process: Yes, I would like to deactivate my account No i didn't make this request, cancel deactivation request Thank you, -- Proble

Attention Yaakov - announcement mail

Yaakov, I find that your mail to cygwin-announce has no Message-Id header. Can that be fixed to aid the threading of the messages? TIA, -- cyg Simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com

Re: Attention PostgreSQL maintainer

Keith Christian writes: > I believe lines 57 through 124 of the latest > /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/postgresql.README are courtesy of the good Henry > S. Thompson. > > Lines 129 to the end of /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/postgresql.README are > those that I contributed to the cause. > > wc /usr/share/doc/Cygw

Re: Attention PostgreSQL maintainer

Marco, I believe lines 57 through 124 of the latest /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/postgresql.README are courtesy of the good Henry S. Thompson. Lines 129 to the end of /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/postgresql.README are those that I contributed to the cause. wc /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/postgresql.README 343 144

Re: Attention PostgreSQL maintainer

You're welcome Marco, thanks for incorporating our comments. I've always found this one of the more helpful mailing lists. One small way that we users can help the very busy maintainers. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Docum

Re: Attention PostgreSQL maintainer

On 30/10/2017 23:45, Keith Christian wrote: Henry, Your "install as as a service" steps above are successful! Keith , Henry, I am adding your notes to the README and modified the /etc/rc.d/init.d/postgresql as suggested. 9.6.6 should be up shortly, and I plan to add 10.1 as test in the near

Re: Attention PostgreSQL maintainer

Woops, I apologize for top-posting. Keith -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Attention PostgreSQL maintainer

Henry, Your "install as as a service" steps above are successful! kcdb=# select version(); version - PostgreSQL 9.6.5 on i686-pc-cygwin, compiled by gcc (GCC) 6.3.0, 32-bit (1 row) uname -

Re: Attention PostgreSQL maintainer

OK, here's and attempt at a set of install instructions for Windows 10 Professional Ver 10.0 Build 14393 Cygwin DLL version: 2.9.0-3 Postgresql: 9.6.5-2 I got slightly muddled with the cygserver and postgress install-as-service steps, so the attached may not quite be right in that regard, I

Re: Attention PostgreSQL maintainer

Keith Christian writes: > I've written a short updated quick start guide for PostgreSQL on Cygwin. Thanks for this, but it's for Windows 7, and will not (at least AFAICT) work on Windows 10. I'll try to provide a W10 narrative if I can recover it from my history... ht -- Henry S. Thomps

Re: Attention PostgreSQL maintainer

On 29/10/2017 00:38, Keith Christian wrote: Marco, I've written a short updated quick start guide for PostgreSQL on Cygwin. It is attached, (cygwin_postgresql_9_6_5_quick_start_example.txt.) You're free to use it if you think it will be helpful for the README or elsewhere. Keith Noted.

Attention PostgreSQL maintainer

Marco, I've written a short updated quick start guide for PostgreSQL on Cygwin. It is attached, (cygwin_postgresql_9_6_5_quick_start_example.txt.) You're free to use it if you think it will be helpful for the README or elsewhere. Keith -

RE: [attention p7zip maintainer] p7zip 15.14 is out

>> Yes but only for development installs. Strictly as a user of the binary >> install I wouldn't want the dependency here. > > We were talking about the cygport file and whether to include a > build-time dependency in there. I also thought the naming for REQUIRES vs DEPEND was a bit confusing unti

Re: [attention p7zip maintainer] p7zip 15.14 is out

cyg Simple writes: > On 4/1/2016 2:49 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: >> Gerrit Haase writes: >>> is is common sense nowadays, to add packages required to build from >>> source to the executable runtime dependencies? >> >> It is quite helpful when some build dependencies aren't quite obvious >> from the re

Re: [attention p7zip maintainer] p7zip 15.14 is out

On 4/1/2016 2:49 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Gerrit Haase writes: >> is is common sense nowadays, to add packages required to build from >> source to the executable runtime dependencies? > > It is quite helpful when some build dependencies aren't quite obvious > from the readme and/or would be option

Re: [attention p7zip maintainer] p7zip 15.14 is out

Gerrit Haase writes: > is is common sense nowadays, to add packages required to build from > source to the executable runtime dependencies? It is quite helpful when some build dependencies aren't quite obvious from the readme and/or would be optional if not specifically requested (say, via configu

Re: [attention p7zip maintainer] p7zip 15.14 is out

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Jon Turney wrote: > [2] https://cygwinports.github.io/cygport/pkg_pkg_cygpart.html#robo424 There are mismatched singular/plural issues there, e.g. "A single-line strings " Csaba -- GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++ The Tao of math:

Re: [attention p7zip maintainer] p7zip 15.14 is out

On 31/03/2016 13:54, Gerrit Haase wrote: 2016-03-19 15:12 GMT+01:00 Achim Gratz wrote: You might also want to add 'DEPEND="nasm"', since the build needs it (probably other stuff too, but I already had that installed). Hello Achim, is is common sense nowadays, to add packages required to buil

Re: [attention p7zip maintainer] p7zip 15.14 is out

Greetings, Gerrit Haase! >> You might also want to add 'DEPEND="nasm"', since the build needs it >> (probably other stuff too, but I already had that installed). > Hello Achim, > is is common sense nowadays, to add packages required to build from > source to the executable runtime dependencies?

Re: [attention p7zip maintainer] p7zip 15.14 is out

2016-03-19 15:12 GMT+01:00 Achim Gratz wrote: > > You might also want to add 'DEPEND="nasm"', since the build needs it > (probably other stuff too, but I already had that installed). Hello Achim, is is common sense nowadays, to add packages required to build from source to the executable runtime

Re: [attention p7zip maintainer] p7zip 15.14 is out

Achim Gratz nexgo.de> writes: > You could have renamed the p7zip-15.09-2.cygwin.patch file or you could > remove it and add these three lines to the cygport file: Whoops, thanks, of course I forgot something dumb like that. Will give it another go next time I'm using Windows. Thanks, Tony --

Re: [attention p7zip maintainer] p7zip 15.14 is out

Tony Kelman writes: > Updated the version, rebased patches and rebuilt, but cygport isn't letting > me upload. I'm getting > > *** ERROR: Package file p7zip/setup.hint doesn't exist. Run "cygport > p7zip-15.14-1.cygport pkg" to build it. > > When I run the suggested "cygport pkg" command, I get >

[attention p7zip maintainer] p7zip 15.14 is out

This version syncs code with 7zip 15.14 and adds the fix for CVE-2015-1038. Regards, ismail -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsub

RE: [attention p7zip maintainer] p7zip 15.14 is out

> This version syncs code with 7zip 15.14 and adds the fix for CVE-2015-1038. > > Regards, > ismail Updated the version, rebased patches and rebuilt, but cygport isn't letting me upload. I'm getting *** ERROR: Package file p7zip/setup.hint doesn't exist. Run "cygport p7zip-15.14-1.cygport pkg" t

Re: base-files-4.2-3 : attention maintainer

Ken Brown writes: > As long as you're updating base-files anyway, maybe you could > implement one of the previously-discussed proposals for showing a > prompt of "#" instead of "$" in shells with sufficient privileges. > Unfortunately, I don't remember if there was ever a consensus reached > on exa

Re: base-files-4.2-3 : attention maintainer

Greetings, Ken Brown! > As long as you're updating base-files anyway, maybe you could implement > one of the previously-discussed proposals for showing a prompt of "#" > instead of "$" in shells with sufficient privileges. Unfortunately, I > don't remember if there was ever a consensus reached

Re: base-files-4.2-3 : attention maintainer

On 9/24/2015 1:29 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Marco Atzeri writes: the bug is in the /etc/postinstall/base-files-mketc.sh of base-files-4.2-3 FILES="hosts protocols services networks" OSNAME="$(/usr/bin/uname -s)" WINETC="$(/usr/bin/cygpath -S -u)/driv

Re: base-files-4.2-3 : attention maintainer

Marco Atzeri writes: > the bug is in the > /etc/postinstall/base-files-mketc.sh > of base-files-4.2-3 > > > FILES="hosts protocols services networks" > OSNAME="$(/usr/bin/uname -s)" > WINETC="$(/usr/bin/cygpath -S -u)/drivers/etc" > > [cut] > > for mke

base-files-4.2-3 : attention maintainer

On 23/09/2015 01:04, Walter L. wrote: Hi, I've just performed a fresh install of the latest (2.2.1) Cygwin on 64-bit Windows 7 and noticed 2 issues with the new version that I'd like to verify whether or not they are bugs: 1) The symlink to protocol file seems incorrect [user@hostname /etc]$

Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

On 4/12/2015 10:39 PM, Eliot Moss wrote: On 4/12/2015 4:17 PM, David Stacey wrote: On 12/04/15 11:03, Marco Atzeri wrote: Seemed to work well with all the '.ly' files I threw at it. I generated PDF, PNG and MIDI files successfully. I tried a few files from a web site with lots of freely avail

Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

On 4/12/2015 4:17 PM, David Stacey wrote: On 12/04/15 11:03, Marco Atzeri wrote: Seemed to work well with all the '.ly' files I threw at it. I generated PDF, PNG and MIDI files successfully. I tried a few files from a web site with lots of freely available lilypond files, and a couple of fil

Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

On 12/04/15 11:03, Marco Atzeri wrote: Removing the cygwin specific usage of cygwin_conv_to_posix_path / cygwin_conv_path did the work. Make check passed on 64bit, and make doc fails on a corner case, most of the HTML documentation was built. OK, so I couldn't resist a little play :-) Seemed

Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

On 12/04/15 11:03, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 2/21/2015 12:19 AM, David Stacey wrote: On 20/02/15 15:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote: unfortunately it turns out that our guile (and lilypond) maintainer has left us, so the packages are orphaned. Jan's last version of guile was 1.8.7-2 for 32 bit. Does

Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

On 2/21/2015 12:19 AM, David Stacey wrote: On 20/02/15 15:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote: unfortunately it turns out that our guile (and lilypond) maintainer has left us, so the packages are orphaned. Jan's last version of guile was 1.8.7-2 for 32 bit. Does anybody have fun to take over maintainer

Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

On 20/02/15 15:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote: unfortunately it turns out that our guile (and lilypond) maintainer has left us, so the packages are orphaned. Jan's last version of guile was 1.8.7-2 for 32 bit. Does anybody have fun to take over maintainership of guile or lilypond? First, let me s

Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 17:51 +0100, Achim Gratz wrote: > Marco Atzeri writes: > > It is easier to install the dependencies of the 32bit version > > > > /usr/bin/cygguile-17.dll > > > > /usr/bin/cygcrypt-0.dll => crypt-1.2-1 > > /usr/bin/cyggmp-3.dll => libgmp3-4.3.2-1 > > That's a slight proble

Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

Marco Atzeri writes: > It is easier to install the dependencies of the 32bit version > > /usr/bin/cygguile-17.dll > > /usr/bin/cygcrypt-0.dll => crypt-1.2-1 > /usr/bin/cyggmp-3.dll => libgmp3-4.3.2-1 That's a slight problem since I think Yaakov just nuked this library… Regards, Achim. -- +<

Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

On Feb 20 17:27, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 2/20/2015 4:42 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Hi Marco, > > > >On Feb 20 15:53, Marco Atzeri wrote: > >>[...] > >>Moreover the 32bit and 64bit are out of sinc > >>1.8.7-2 vs 1.8.8-1 > > > >unfortunately it turns out that our guile (and lilypond) maintainer

Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

On 2/20/2015 4:18 PM, Cosimo Lupo wrote: Hi, is there a way to downgrade and force cygwin use the previous version of make-4.1? any specific reason to not use version 4.1 ? (except the momentary install glitch) thanks It is easier to install the dependencies of the 32bit version /usr/b

Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

On 2/20/2015 4:42 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Hi Marco, On Feb 20 15:53, Marco Atzeri wrote: [...] Moreover the 32bit and 64bit are out of sinc 1.8.7-2 vs 1.8.8-1 unfortunately it turns out that our guile (and lilypond) maintainer has left us, so the packages are orphaned. Jan's last version

Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

Hi Marco, On Feb 20 15:53, Marco Atzeri wrote: > [...] > Moreover the 32bit and 64bit are out of sinc > 1.8.7-2 vs 1.8.8-1 unfortunately it turns out that our guile (and lilypond) maintainer has left us, so the packages are orphaned. Jan's last version of guile was 1.8.7-2 for 32 bit. I don't r

Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

Hi, is there a way to downgrade and force cygwin use the previous version of make-4.1? thanks -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#

Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer

On 2/20/2015 2:44 PM, Franz Sirl wrote: Am 2015-02-19 um 20:19 schrieb Ti Strga: BLUF: either the new make package needs cygltdl-7 as one of its dependencies, or Guile does, so that setup.exe can Do The Right Thing. I updated to make-4.1-1 and the executable immediately broke: $ make --versio

Re: attention tar maintainer

On 04/09/2014 12:46 PM, George Pearson wrote: > Would it be possible to update the version of tar currently in cygwin? > The current version is 1.26, which, in the GNU project anyway, was > released in March 2011. I need a version with a bug fix done in Nov > 2011, so 1.27 or the latest (1.27-1)

attention tar maintainer

Would it be possible to update the version of tar currently in cygwin? The current version is 1.26, which, in the GNU project anyway, was released in March 2011. I need a version with a bug fix done in Nov 2011, so 1.27 or the latest (1.27-1) should do. The bug fix fixes (among other things) th

Re: ATTENTION GCC PACKAGE MAINTAINER - Re: GCC: core, g++ version mismatch

On 10/31/2013 00:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:. > > I restrict the filenames that can be uploaded and neglected to add '+'. > I just added it now so you will have to upload those files again. Sorry > for the inconvenience. > Done, reuploaded. >> Strange that I did not get any errors on my end,

Re: ATTENTION GCC PACKAGE MAINTAINER - Re: GCC: core, g++ version mismatch

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:00:58PM +0800, JonY wrote: >On 10/30/2013 22:42, marco atzeri wrote: >> Il 10/30/2013 2:52 PM, Christopher Faylor ha scritto: >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:31:39AM -0500, Trent Bradley wrote: I didn't see this mentioned anywhere yet, but there appears to be a v

Re: ATTENTION GCC PACKAGE MAINTAINER - Re: GCC: core, g++ version mismatch

On 10/30/2013 22:42, marco atzeri wrote: > Il 10/30/2013 2:52 PM, Christopher Faylor ha scritto: >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:31:39AM -0500, Trent Bradley wrote: >>> I didn't see this mentioned anywhere yet, but there appears to be a >>> version mismatch between gcc-core and gcc-g++. >>> >>> gcc-c

Re: ATTENTION GCC PACKAGE MAINTAINER - Re: GCC: core, g++ version mismatch

Il 10/30/2013 2:52 PM, Christopher Faylor ha scritto: On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:31:39AM -0500, Trent Bradley wrote: I didn't see this mentioned anywhere yet, but there appears to be a version mismatch between gcc-core and gcc-g++. gcc-core is listed as having 4.8.2-1 available, gcc-g++ is stil

ATTENTION GCC PACKAGE MAINTAINER - Re: GCC: core, g++ version mismatch

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:31:39AM -0500, Trent Bradley wrote: >I didn't see this mentioned anywhere yet, but there appears to be a >version mismatch between gcc-core and gcc-g++. > >gcc-core is listed as having 4.8.2-1 available, gcc-g++ is still at 4.8.1-3. > >Updating gcc-core (and libgcc1 with

For your immediate attention.

For your immediate attention. This is to inform you that your funds has been programmed for transfer to the bank account details below. Bank name: Raiffeisen Banka, Bank Branch : Resavska 24/ 11070, Bank City: Beograd Srbija, Bank Swift: RZBSRSBG, Account Holder: Sasa Stojanovic Destination

cygwin package for lyx-2.0.5.1. Re: lyx postinstall error - attention maintainer

Dear cygwin-apps, I was notified about a postinstall error in the lyx 1.6.6 package that I prepared about two years ago. I have retired from the lyx development team but since no one picked up my role as the cygwin maintainer, I have prepared a cygwin package for lyx 2.0.5.1, which can be download

Cyrus IMAPD -- Attention Maintainer

Hi, Can the maintainer for Cygwin's Cyrus IMAPD binaries compile the `imtest' program (located in the Cyrus IMAPD imtest directory) and make it accessible from the Cygwin setup program? Thanks. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/fa

Re: lyx postinstall error - attention maintainer

On 1/9/2013 6:29 PM, Bo Peng wrote: Hi, Marco, I retired from the lyx development team a few years ago and have stopped maintaining its cygwin build. I have asked around but nobody seemed to be interested in taking over my role. Anyway, if the 1.6.6 building is not working properly, I will try t

Re: lyx postinstall error - attention maintainer

Hi, Marco, I retired from the lyx development team a few years ago and have stopped maintaining its cygwin build. I have asked around but nobody seemed to be interested in taking over my role. Anyway, if the 1.6.6 building is not working properly, I will try to update it to the latest version in t

lyx postinstall error - attention maintainer

On 1/9/2013 1:20 AM, Tim Collins wrote: On 1/7/2013 10:59 PM, marco atzeri wrote: On 1/8/2013 7:49 AM, Tim Collins wrote: Marco, The package is lyx not lynx. $ cygcheck -l lyx | grep etc /etc/postinstall/lyx.sh/lyx.sh sorry, than it is a package mistake Mon Jun 14 02:22:31 2010

Re: Python maintainer attention - wrong dependency

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:48:25PM +0100, marco atzeri wrote: > It seems the dependency was wrongly adjusted for the > test version: 2.7.3-1 > > Today: > setup-timestamp: 1356006675 > > requires: crypt libbz2_1 libdb4.5 libexpat1 libffi4 libgcc1 libgdbm4 > libintl8 libncursesw10 libreadline7 libs

Python maintainer attention - wrong dependency

It seems the dependency was wrongly adjusted for the test version: 2.7.3-1 Today: setup-timestamp: 1356006675 requires: crypt libbz2_1 libdb4.5 libexpat1 libffi4 libgcc1 libgdbm4 libintl8 libncursesw10 libreadline7 libsqlite3_0 libopenssl100 zlib0 _autorebase cygwin Previously setup-timesta

Re: ATTENTION JARI AALTO Re: quilt: permission denied problems with helper scripts

On 2012-09-15 08:09, Jari Aalto wrote: > New release with the fixes has been submitted to the archives. Thanks! Cheers, Peter -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe in

Re: ATTENTION JARI AALTO Re: quilt: permission denied problems with helper scripts

2012-09-14 18:33 Peter Rosin : | | On 2012-09-14 16:16, Christopher Faylor wrote: | > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 01:05:08PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: | | >> $ ls -lG /usr/share/quilt/scripts | | >> -rw-r--r-- 1 peda 13114 May 24 2011 dependency-graph | >> ... | >> should all be chmod +x | | Oh, forgo

Re: ATTENTION JARI AALTO Re: quilt: permission denied problems with helper scripts

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 05:33:58PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >[I already had Jari on bcc, given the track record, but I managed not >to scream :-) He's on bcc this time too] I used all caps (and bcc'ed him) specifically because he often seems to miss these discussions. cgf -- Problem reports:

Re: ATTENTION JARI AALTO Re: quilt: permission denied problems with helper scripts

[I already had Jari on bcc, given the track record, but I managed not to scream :-) He's on bcc this time too] On 2012-09-14 16:16, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 01:05:08PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Hi! >> >> When working on some newlib patches, ran into this: >> >> peda@

ATTENTION JARI AALTO Re: quilt: permission denied problems with helper scripts

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 01:05:08PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >Hi! > >When working on some newlib patches, ran into this: > >peda@pulkan ~/newlib/src/newlib >$ quilt refresh >/usr/share/quilt/refresh: line 253: >/usr/share/quilt/scripts/remove-trailing-ws: Permission denied >Patch patches/wordexp-a

Re: gcc: stable 4.5 soon? (attention Dave Korn)

On 26/01/2011 05:08, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 05:45 -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> Dave, >> >> Our GCC 4.5 packages has been "experimental" since August. I have been >> running 4.5.1, and now 4.5.2, with only slight modifications to your >> patchset since then[1], inclu

Re: gcc: stable 4.5 soon? (attention Dave Korn)

On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 05:45 -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > Dave, > > Our GCC 4.5 packages has been "experimental" since August. I have been > running 4.5.1, and now 4.5.2, with only slight modifications to your > patchset since then[1], including an important fix for libgcj[2]. My > latest ch

Re: Attention "task" maintainer Re: Task program - Aborted (core dumped) failure on CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.7.8s(0.231/5/3) 20100924 15:55:44 i686 Cygwin

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:30:00AM +0100, Federico Hernandez wrote: >> It looks like the maintainer for the task program unsubscribed from this >> mailing list in September. ??Maybe he's reading the mailing list via >> gmane or something but I've bcc'ed him just in case. >> >> Federico are you stil

Re: Attention "task" maintainer Re: Task program - Aborted (core dumped) failure on CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.7.8s(0.231/5/3) 20100924 15:55:44 i686 Cygwin

> It looks like the maintainer for the task program unsubscribed from this > mailing list in September.  Maybe he's reading the mailing list via > gmane or something but I've bcc'ed him just in case. > > Federico are you still supporting the task program?  If so, it looks > like we need some suppor

Attention "task" maintainer Re: Task program - Aborted (core dumped) failure on CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.7.8s(0.231/5/3) 20100924 15:55:44 i686 Cygwin

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:06:47PM -0700, Keith Christian wrote: >Upgraded to cygwin1-20101212.dll.bz2, replaced cygwin1.dll with this >version. Rebooted, no change, uname -a shows new cygwin1.dll in >place. > >Wed Dec 15 14:03:33 (kchrist...@kchristian-l) ~>uname -a ; task >CYGWIN_NT-5.1 KCHRISTI

Attention JARI AALTO - Re: 1.7.7 wput fails to connect to FTP server

I've bcc'ed the wput maintainer since they are (rather alarmingly?) not subscribed to the Cygwin mailing list. Jari, could you help this person out? He's been patiently reporting problems with wput for some time now. cgf On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:18:02PM +0200, Francois Botha wrote: >On Mon, O

RE: [Attention: opengl^H^H^H^H^H w32api,libGLdevel maintainer] Incorrect GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT in glext.h

André Bleau wrote on Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:51 AM: > Bryan Thrall wrote: >> The opengl 1.1.0-10 package has incorrect values for GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT and >> GL_DOT3_RGBA_EXT: >> >> #define GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT 0x86AE >> #define GL_DOT3_RGBA_EXT 0x86AF >> >> According

Re: [Attention: opengl^H^H^H^H^H w32api,libGLdevel maintainer] Incorrect GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT in glext.h

Bryan Thrall wrote: Hi Brian, >The opengl 1.1.0-10 package has incorrect values for GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT and > GL_DOT3_RGBA_EXT: > > #define GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT 0x86AE > #define GL_DOT3_RGBA_EXT 0x86AF > > According to > http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/EXT/text

[Attention: opengl maintainer] Incorrect GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT in glext.h

The opengl 1.1.0-10 package has incorrect values for GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT and GL_DOT3_RGBA_EXT: #define GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT 0x86AE #define GL_DOT3_RGBA_EXT 0x86AF According to http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/EXT/texture_env_dot3.txt, they should be: GL_DOT3_RGB_EX

Re: [attention base-files maintainer] copying /bin files to home dir on first run of cygwin.bat

> I did a base install of cygwin 1.7 (using setup-1.7.exe), > and the first time I ran cygwin.bat, it gave the following: > > +/bin/mkdir -p `dirname ${fDest}` Thanks I'll patch that ASAP. J. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http:

[attention base-files maintainer] copying /bin files to home dir on first run of cygwin.bat

I did a base install of cygwin 1.7 (using setup-1.7.exe), and the first time I ran cygwin.bat, it gave the following: Copying skeleton files. These files are for the user to personalise their cygwin experience. They will never be overwritten nor automatically updated. bash: cd: /etc/skel: N

ATTENTION;PLEASE GET BACK TO ME

-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: Fix your packages! (attention: a2ps, tetex-bin, nfs-server, gv, uw-imap, and xerces-c maintainers)

'cygcheck -c --verbose' says: -- ... tetex3.0.0-3OK Missing file: /etc/postinstall/post-texmf.sh from package tetex-base tetex-base 3.0.0-3Incomplete tetex-bin3.0.0-3OK tet

Re: Fix your packages! (attention: a2ps, tetex-bin, nfs-server, gv, uw-imap, and xerces-c maintainers)

On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > Could this be the reason for which I obtain that > > tetex-base 3.0.0-3Incomplete > tetex-extra 3.0.0-3Incomplete > tetex-tiny 3.0.0-3Incomplete > > from cygcheck

Re: Fix your packages! (attention: a2ps, tetex-bin, nfs-server, gv, uw-imap, and xerces-c maintainers)

Could this be the reason for which I obtain that tetex-base 3.0.0-3Incomplete tetex-extra 3.0.0-3Incomplete tetex-tiny 3.0.0-3Incomplete from cygcheck -c, even if I reinstall them ? Cheers, Angelo.

Re: Attention libtool maintainer: Re: `make install' of glib fails

"Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Franz Haeuslschmid wrote: > >> "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [... Stupid me changing $LDFLAGS and installing `libtool' on my own ...] > It was meant as a ping to the libtool maintainer. Since there are > always some Cygwin spe

Re: Attention libtool maintainer: Re: `make install' of glib fails

Franz Haeuslschmid wrote: "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Franz Haeuslschmid wrote: After having managed to actually make the latest version of glib, `make install' fails and spits out an error message that I don't understand (excuse the mass of lines): [... Output of make

Re: Attention libtool maintainer: Re: `make install' of glib fails

Franz Haeuslschmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Franz Haeuslschmid wrote: >> >>> After having managed to actually make the latest version of glib, >>> `make install' fails and spits out an error message that I don't >>> understand (excuse the mas

Re: Attention libtool maintainer: Re: `make install' of glib fails

"Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Franz Haeuslschmid wrote: > >> After having managed to actually make the latest version of glib, >> `make install' fails and spits out an error message that I don't >> understand (excuse the mass of lines): [... Output of make showing messages of un

Attention libtool maintainer: Re: `make install' of glib fails

Franz Haeuslschmid wrote: After having managed to actually make the latest version of glib, `make install' fails and spits out an error message that I don't understand (excuse the mass of lines): [EMAIL PROTECTED] /cygdrive/d/Src/glib-2.6.4/gobject $ make install make install-am make[1]: Ente

Re: TEST release of SWIG: 1.3.24-1 (Attention SWIG users!)

zzapper wrote: > >I have uploaded SWIG 1.3.24 as a TEST release. > > > Is Swig something to do with drinking alcohol ? > > from the TFSRCPUTIAGITPABSOTPITUP > (The Friendly Society for Reminding CYGWIN Package Updaters That It's A Good > Idea To Put A Brief > Synopsis Of Their Package In Their U

Re: TEST release of SWIG: 1.3.24-1 (Attention SWIG users!)

On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:43:55 -, wrote: >I have uploaded SWIG 1.3.24 as a TEST release. > Is Swig something to do with drinking alcohol ? from the TFSRCPUTIAGITPABSOTPITUP (The Friendly Society for Reminding CYGWIN Package Updaters That It's A Good Idea To Put A Brief Synopsis Of Their Packa

TEST release of SWIG: 1.3.24-1 (Attention SWIG users!)

I have uploaded SWIG 1.3.24 as a TEST release. SWIG has undergone *major* changes since the last Cygwin release was made, *especially* with respect to bindings consisting of multiple co-operating modules. Therefore, I propose to hold this version in [test] for one month, before releasing it to

Re: anyone paying attention to bugzilla?

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I'm not exactly contributing. I just am the default owner of the cygwin > dll bugs. Some poor soul has decided that bugzilla is the place to > submit patches in that category and I haven't seen either of the two > people who volunteered to police

FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION.

Cygwin I am Johnson Roshdy, son to Mr.Hatem Roshdy, On the 31st of October 1999, my father was involved in a plane crash(EGYPTIAN AIRLINE 990) with other passengers aboard as you may confirm through this website: http://www.cnn.com/US/9911/02/egyptair990.list/ index.html

Attention: NEW wm-messenger!

We represent your attention new wm-messenger! Such you yet didn't see, a heap of opportunities! To use very simply, is more detailed on a site http://wm-messenger.com . -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems

Attention: NEW wm-messenger!

We represent your attention new wm-messenger! Such you yet didn't see, a heap of opportunities! To use very simply, is more detailed on a site http://wm-messenger.com . -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems

For your Attention!

you can't, or decide not to, I will understand. Thanks for your attention anyhow. Khin Myint Lwin -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ:

Attention

REQUEST I am MR REUBEN SAVIMBI one of the favorite sons of Mr.JONAS SAVIMBI (The Rebel leader) and also the head of the Unita Forces of Angola who was killed in the Struggle between Angolan arm forces and his unita rebels On Friday the 22nd of February 2002. I am from Angola but currently I am

Attention

REQUEST I am MR REUBEN SAVIMBI one of the favorite sons of Mr.JONAS SAVIMBI (The Rebel leader) and also the head of the Unita Forces of Angola who was killed in the Struggle between Angolan arm forces and his unita rebels On Friday the 22nd of February 2002. I am from Angola but currently I am