Eric Blake wrote, on 11/7/2005 3:35 PM:
BTW i think there is a bug in the snapshot in file
/usr/include/sys/stdio.h, line 338. Had to change:
-ssize_t _EXFUN(__getline, (char **, size_t *, FILE *));
+ssize_t _EXFUN(__getline, (char **, size_t *, int, FILE *));
No, this is wrong. getlin
>
> BTW i think there is a bug in the snapshot in file
> /usr/include/sys/stdio.h, line 338. Had to change:
>
> -ssize_t _EXFUN(__getline, (char **, size_t *, FILE *));
> +ssize_t _EXFUN(__getline, (char **, size_t *, int, FILE *));
No, this is wrong. getline really is (char**, size_t*, FILE*)
Gerrit P. Haase wrote, on 11/4/2005 8:37 PM:
Nenad Antic wrote:
Sorry for starting a new thread, but I think I made a mistake. My
original post disappeared, or rather never appeared among new
threaded messages, since I continued on an existing old thread. Just
hoping to get some help...
Co
Harald Joerg wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase writes:
Harald Joerg wrote:
We already know that - for archeological reasons - mod_perl's DSO
library happens to have the same file name as perl's, eh? Here's
a place where this *really* bit me.
Oh yeah, I cannot believe that they don't change t
Gerrit P. Haase writes:
> Harald Joerg wrote:
>
>>We already know that - for archeological reasons - mod_perl's DSO
>>library happens to have the same file name as perl's, eh? Here's
>>a place where this *really* bit me.
>
> Oh yeah, I cannot believe that they don't change the name.
Harald Joerg wrote:
We already know that - for archeological reasons - mod_perl's DSO
library happens to have the same file name as perl's, eh? Here's
a place where this *really* bit me.
Oh yeah, I cannot believe that they don't change the name. If someone
has a nice workaround to a
I wrote:
> Gerrit P. Haase writes:
>>> [...] Would mod_perl work with a mod_so setup as well?
>>
>> Yes it should work. Have you tried to link directly against the DLL?
>
> You mean against /usr/bin/libhttpd.dll?
>
> I've tried, but failed miserably so far. I've been starting with the
> build p
7 matches
Mail list logo
