On Jan 28 11:43, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> > It has the unfortunate side-effect that downgrading packages is not
> > possible anymore, and worse, the package could be silently removed.
> > That's a teeny little bit more exciting action than I anticipated with
> >
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> It has the unfortunate side-effect that downgrading packages is not
> possible anymore, and worse, the package could be silently removed.
> That's a teeny little bit more exciting action than I anticipated with
> my change.
With your second patch the orphan
On Jan 27 16:55, Warren Young wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2015, at 7:07 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>
> >>> On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote:
> Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not
> supposed to read):
> >>>
> >>> Haha. The cygwin-apps list is publically archived for a r
On Jan 27, 2015, at 7:07 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>>> On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote:
Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not
supposed to read):
>>>
>>> Haha. The cygwin-apps list is publically archived for a reason :)
>
>> Yes, I know ... making fun.
>
>> Ho
On 1/27/2015 5:51 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Marco Atzeri!
PS: the cygwin web site seems very slow. Is it just my connection ?
HTTP or HTTPS?
It seems, the HTTPS part sometimes bugs out.
both, but now is OK
--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdae...@yandex.ru) 27.01.2015, <19:50>
Regards
Greetings, Marco Atzeri!
> PS: the cygwin web site seems very slow. Is it just my connection ?
HTTP or HTTPS?
It seems, the HTTPS part sometimes bugs out.
--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdae...@yandex.ru) 27.01.2015, <19:50>
Sorry for my terrible english...
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.c
On Jan 27 10:24, Vince Rice wrote:
> > PS: the cygwin web site seems very slow. Is it just my connection ?
>
> What he said. It’s been off and on for a couple of weeks, but this
> morning it actually timed out. I actually did a traceroute and it was
> a 70.* address that was the problem. (Sorry, I
On 1/27/2015 5:24 PM, Vince Rice wrote:
PS: the cygwin web site seems very slow. Is it just my connection ?
What he said. It’s been off and on for a couple of weeks, but this morning it
actually timed out. I actually did a traceroute and it was a 70.* address that
was the problem. (Sorry, I d
> PS: the cygwin web site seems very slow. Is it just my connection ?
What he said. It’s been off and on for a couple of weeks, but this morning it
actually timed out. I actually did a traceroute and it was a 70.* address that
was the problem. (Sorry, I did it at home and don’t have the output w
On 1/27/2015 1:17 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote:
Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not
supposed to read):
Which I did. Satisfied user here. An user which never uses the
keep/current/experimental radio buttons, though (which I consider
s
> > One detail bugging me (and probably others as well) in Setup is this.
> > If I chose to install a test version of a package, and then start Setup
> > again, Setup will default to the current version of the package again.
> > If I'm just a bit careless, I'll overwrite my test version with the cu
On Jan 27 17:05, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>
> >> Which I did. Satisfied user here. An user which never uses the
> >> keep/current/experimental radio buttons, though (which I consider
> >> superfluous).
>
> > Thanks for testing, and that's a good point. These radio butto
Greetings, Houder!
>> On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote:
>>> Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not
>>> supposed to read):
>>
>> Haha. The cygwin-apps list is publically archived for a reason :)
> Yes, I know ... making fun.
> However, as I have NOT seen any maintainer re
Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>> Which I did. Satisfied user here. An user which never uses the
>> keep/current/experimental radio buttons, though (which I consider
>> superfluous).
> Thanks for testing, and that's a good point. These radio buttons
> are rather... weird. I think it might be a go
On Jan 27 14:16, Houder wrote:
> > On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote:
> >> Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not
> >> supposed to read):
> >
> > Haha. The cygwin-apps list is publically archived for a reason :)
>
> Yes, I know ... making fun.
>
> However, as I have NOT se
> On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote:
>> Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not
>> supposed to read):
>
> Haha. The cygwin-apps list is publically archived for a reason :)
Yes, I know ... making fun.
However, as I have NOT seen any maintainer respond "enthusiastically"
to y
On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote:
> Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not
> supposed to read):
Haha. The cygwin-apps list is publically archived for a reason :)
> Title: Setup patch to keep test version if test version installed
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I need a bit of fe
Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not supposed to
read):
Title: Setup patch to keep test version if test version installed
> Hi guys,
>
> I need a bit of feedback.
>
> One detail bugging me (and probably others as well) in Setup is this.
> If I chose to install a test
18 matches
Mail list logo
