ng question is "Can I install Cygwin without using admin
privileges, and if so, how do I do it?", that is answered in the FAQ,
here:
https://cygwin.com/faq.html#faq.setup.noroot
Best wishes - Eliot Moss
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https
pdate things as packages evolve (and sometimes new packages
are added).
If your underlying question is "Can I install Cygwin without using admin
privileges, and if so, how do I do it?", that is answered in the FAQ, here:
https://cygwin.com/faq.html#faq.setup.noroot
Best wishes - Eliot Mo
Am 04.04.2020 um 03:55 schrieb Phoenix Soul via Cygwin:
The setup-x86_64.exe requires admin priveleges. Is it possible to put it
into a ZIP file for use?
--
it does not if you are installing only for one user.
IT is not clear to me what you mean for
"put it into a ZIP file"
Regards
MArco
--
The setup-x86_64.exe requires admin priveleges. Is it possible to put it
into a ZIP file for use?
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#u
> However, this should work (I haven't tried lately):
>
> .\setup-x86 --arch=x86_64
> Assuming you aren't part of the .001% who can't run x86 executables.
That works, as soon as I have renamed setup-x86.exe to foo.exe!
That's an easy and simple solution.
Thanks,
Frédéric
--
Problem reports:
Christopher Faylor sent the following at Wednesday, September 25, 2013 1:06 PM
>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:59:57PM +, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID)
>[E] wrote:
>>>Does setup for 64 bit cygwin need to be 64 bit? Might all this
>>be avoided if setup-x86_64.exe were itself 32 bit application?
>
>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:59:57PM +, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
wrote:
>Does setup for 64 bit cygwin need to be 64 bit? Might all this
>be avoided if setup-x86_64.exe were itself 32 bit application?
I lost that argument. Apparently some 64-bit systems can't run 32-bit
applications.
Greetings, Larry Hall (Cygwin)!
>> In fact, what would be the issue to set the requested execution level
>> to "asInvoker" for the official setup-x86_64.exe?
>> People with admin rights will still be able to install for all users
>> and people without admin rights will be able to install for
>> th
Does setup for 64 bit cygwin need to be 64 bit? Might all this
be avoided if setup-x86_64.exe were itself 32 bit application?
- Barry
Disclaimer: Statements made herein are not made on behalf of NIAID.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cyg
On 9/25/2013 11:21 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
In fact, what would be the issue to set the requested execution level
to "asInvoker" for the official setup-x86_64.exe?
People with admin rights will still be able to install for all users
and people without admin rights will be able to install for
them
>> In fact, what would be the issue to set the requested execution level
>> to "asInvoker" for the official setup-x86_64.exe?
>> People with admin rights will still be able to install for all users
>> and people without admin rights will be able to install for
>> them-selves.
>
>
> Doesn't that mea
On 9/25/2013 10:11 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
In fact, what would be the issue to set the requested execution level
to "asInvoker" for the official setup-x86_64.exe?
People with admin rights will still be able to install for all users
and people without admin rights will be able to install for
t
> I just modified this:
> Index: setup64.exe.manifest
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/cygwin-apps/setup/setup64.exe.manifest,v
> retrieving revision 2.1
> diff -r2.1 setup64.exe.manifest
> 25c25
> < uiAccess="false"/>
> ---
>>
>> Trying to compress it with upx failed with an error message:
>> upx: setup-x86-64.exe: CantPackException: can't pack new-exe
>
> UPX can't compress PE+ (64bit) executables.
That's right, I have the same issue.
Frédéric
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Am 24.09.2013 23:49, schrieb Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]:
>>
>> Trying to compress it with upx failed with an error message:
>> upx: setup-x86-64.exe: CantPackException: can't pack new-exe
So others are using mpress instead. http://www.ma
Am 24.09.2013 23:49, schrieb Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]:
Trying to compress it with upx failed with an error message:
upx: setup-x86-64.exe: CantPackException: can't pack new-exe
UPX can't compress PE+ (64bit) executables.
Regards,
Achim.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/
Frédéric Bron sent the following at Tuesday, September 24, 2013 1:10 AM
>I have built a version of setup-x86-64.exe for people that do
>not have administrator privileges. It can be downloaded here:
>http://www.casalibus.fr/cygwin/
Merci!
For your next update:
Trying to compress it with upx faile
I have built a version of setup-x86-64.exe for people that do not have
administrator privileges.
It can be downloaded here: http://www.casalibus.fr/cygwin/
Regards,
Frédéric
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) sent the following at Sunday, September 22, 2013 9:42 PM
>No, "All Users" is also required to set up services (like sshd, crond,
>etc.) to work for all users (i.e. switch user context). This is the
>recommended way to install so that these subsequent facilities can be
>used with
On 9/22/2013 2:18 PM, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong (like I need to ask!), but my impression is that the
only thing for which setup for 'Cygwin for All Users' currently needs admin
privileges is to create shortcuts in "C:\Users\All Users\De
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) sent the following at Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:42 PM
>UAC Installer Detection only affects x86 binaries, so that only helps
>with setup-x86.exe. As for setup-x86_64.exe, its builtin manifest
>requires Admin privileges because otherwise it won't
> No. setup.exe (either 32bit or 64bit) is a native windows application, and
> if you're trying to build it within cygwin, then you MUST use a cross
> compiler -- either i686-w64-mingw32 or x86_64-w64-mingw32. when configuring
> the build, just do:
>
> configure --host=i686-w64-mingw32 --build=i686
On 9/18/2013 1:53 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
Is it possible to build setup64.exe from a 32bit cygwin?
As previously mentioned, despite the subject, there is no such thing as
setup64.exe. The makefile creates setup.exe. The filename gets changed
when it gets uploaded to cygwin.com to either setu
>>Is it possible to build setup64.exe from a 32bit cygwin?
>
> As previously mentioned, despite the subject, there is no such thing as
> setup64.exe. The makefile creates setup.exe. The filename gets changed
> when it gets uploaded to cygwin.com to either setup-x86.exe or
> setup-x86_64.exe.
do
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 07:30:35PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bron wrote:
>> You can build setup.exe yourself for x86_64-w64-mingw32 with the
>> requestedExecutionLevel entry removed from the manifest. The sources are in
>> cygwin-apps CVS.
>
>I got the sources and ran bootstrap.sh
>I got setup.exe but not s
> You can build setup.exe yourself for x86_64-w64-mingw32 with the
> requestedExecutionLevel entry removed from the manifest. The sources are in
> cygwin-apps CVS.
I got the sources and ran bootstrap.sh
I got setup.exe but not setup64.exe
Is it possible to build setup64.exe from a 32bit cygwin?
> You can build setup.exe yourself for x86_64-w64-mingw32 with the
> requestedExecutionLevel entry removed from the manifest. The sources are in
> cygwin-apps CVS.
do I need a password to get the sources?
I get this message:
CVS password file /home/xxx/.cvspass does not exist - creating a new
fil
> And without a proxy server:
> $ cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anon...@sourceware.org:/cvs/cygwin-apps co cygwin-setup
> cvs checkout: CVS password file /cygdrive/d/Documents/.cvspass does
> not exist - creating a new file
> cvs server: cannot find module `cygwin-setup' - ignored
> cvs [checkout aborted]: c
> do I need a password to get the sources?
> I get this message:
> CVS password file /home/xxx/.cvspass does not exist - creating a new
> file cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above
> messages if any)
>
> But this may be just due to our proxy server.
And without a proxy ser
for setup-x86_64.exe, its builtin manifest
>requires Admin privileges because otherwise it won't promote itself
>automatically, and most people install Cygwin for All Users.
>
>> Is there any workaround? Would it be possible to supply a setup that
>> do not need admin pr
not work.
I also do not have the rights to modify the Local Security Policy.
UAC Installer Detection only affects x86 binaries, so that only helps
with setup-x86.exe. As for setup-x86_64.exe, its builtin manifest
requires Admin privileges because otherwise it won't promote itself
automati
On 12/09/2013 11:52 AM, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
Ryan Johnson sent the following at Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:31 AM
Try *copying* setup64.exe to foo.exe. Or download it again but save it
with the name foo.exe.
Windows may be remembering that the file used to be called setu
On 12/09/2013 11:26 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
Try *copying* setup64.exe to foo.exe. Or download it again but save it
with the name foo.exe.
Windows may be remembering that the file used to be called setup*.exe.
That memory might not get copied.
Doesn't work: "the requested operation requires ele
Ryan Johnson sent the following at Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:31 AM
>>> Try *copying* setup64.exe to foo.exe. Or download it again but save it
>>> with the name foo.exe.
>>> Windows may be remembering that the file used to be called setup*.exe.
>>> That memory might not get copied.
>> Doesn't
> I have vague memories that someone (Corinna?) suggested copying the file to
> a USB key and back: the FAT filesystem can't track the permissions that
> cause this behavior. Never tested it myself, though (maybe I should, it
> would be nice to lose the UAC prompt).
doesn't work.
Frédéric
--
Pro
ed to rename the .exe to foo.exe but this did not work. I also do
>not have the rights to modify the Local Security Policy.
>
>Is there any workaround? Would it be possible to supply a setup that do
>not need admin privileges?
Try *copying* setup64.exe to foo.exe. Or download it ag
> Try *copying* setup64.exe to foo.exe. Or download it again but save it
> with the name foo.exe.
> Windows may be remembering that the file used to be called setup*.exe.
> That memory might not get copied.
Doesn't work: "the requested operation requires elevation".
I am packaging a program wit
modify the Local Security Policy.
Is there any workaround? Would it be possible to supply a setup that
do not need admin privileges?
Regards,
Frédéric
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com
On 1/25/2013 10:01 AM, Alan wrote:
The first problem comes when I try to install the rxvt package. Running the
installer again with that package selected results in an error.
Package: rxvt rxvt.sh exit code 3
rxvt is a very old, practically deprecated package of a dead code-line. If
you must
Hi - I'm not sure if this will help your problem, but in the past I
have had to install Cygwin to a number of non-networked machines. For
me, the easiest way was to use setup.exe with the option of "save
files but don't install". You can copy the saved folder and setup.exe
onto a CD and take it t
I have downloaded and installed cygwin on one machine and would like to install
it on a second machine which is non-networked and for which I don't have
administrator rights. However, I am running into some issues which are described
below.
I have created a Mapped Network Drive (X:) for the folder
> I applied a patch to CVS which should solve this problem in a generic
> way. I observed how Windows handles the privileges when creating a
> token and your scenario should be nicely covered now.
Confirmed: with with 2011-10-15 snapshot, all of my privileges are enabled
now when I log in with p
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> . . .
> By simply trying them out, I created a list of the privileges which
> trigger the high integrity level requirement. See, for instance,
> http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/winsup/cygwin/sec_helper.cc.diff?r1=1.93&r2=1.94&cvsroot=src&f=h
> For the secur
On Oct 15 13:32, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > On Oct 14 21:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > I applied a patch to CVS which should solve this problem in a generic
> > way. I observed how Windows handles the privileges when creating a
> > token and your scenario should be nicely covered now. I also dr
> On Oct 14 21:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Oct 14 20:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Oct 14 11:18, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > > > So the difference AFAICT is the membership in the Administrators group.
> > > > Notice also in the two listings below, that by password authentication,
> > >
On Oct 14 21:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 14 20:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Oct 14 11:18, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > > So the difference AFAICT is the membership in the Administrators group.
> > > Notice also in the two listings below, that by password authentication,
> > > backup ge
On Oct 14 20:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 14 11:18, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > So the difference AFAICT is the membership in the Administrators group.
> > Notice also in the two listings below, that by password authentication,
> > backup gets
> >
> > Mandatory Label\High Mandatory Level
>
On Oct 14 11:18, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> When user backup logs in by ssh, he gets different results:
>
> * If he logs in by password authentication, then whoami /all shows
> the right user name and privileges, and he can use the privileges. See
> Listing 1 below. So this is fine.
> * If h
> Does Windows 7 Home Premium come with a native whoami?
Yes, it does. So here's what I've found. I have two users, who get
different results.
(1) User admin is a member of the Administrators group. He gets the
expected results: whether he logs in by password or pubkey authentication,
he can
there a way around that?
> > > > How can I get the admin
> > > > privileges for that session?
> > >
> > > Winding this up:
> > >
> > > Password authentication to sshd is all that's needed to be granted the
> > > account
> On Sep 12 10:24, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > > When a user with administrative privileges logs in to sshd, it seems that
> > > the user is only granted
> > > standard user privileges for that session. Is there a way around that?
> > > How can I get the
On Sep 12 10:24, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > When a user with administrative privileges logs in to sshd, it seems that
> > the user is only granted
> > standard user privileges for that session. Is there a way around that?
> > How can I get the admin
> &g
> When a user with administrative privileges logs in to sshd, it seems that the
> user is only granted
> standard user privileges for that session. Is there a way around that? How
> can I get the admin
> privileges for that session?
Winding this up:
Password authentication
> Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:59:23 -0400
> From: moss
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Re: admin privileges when logging in by ssh?
>
> On 9/11/2011 9:07 PM, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> >>> When a user with administrative privileges logs in to sshd, it seems that
> >>&g
On 9/11/2011 9:07 PM, Andrew Schulman wrote:
When a user with administrative privileges logs in to sshd, it seems that the
user is only granted
standard user privileges for that session. Is there a way around that? How
can I get the admin
privileges for that session?
Nevermind. I found
> > When a user with administrative privileges logs in to sshd, it seems that
> > the user is only granted
> > standard user privileges for that session. Is there a way around that?
> > How can I get the admin
> > privileges for that session?
>
> Nevermi
> When a user with administrative privileges logs in to sshd, it seems that the
> user is only granted
> standard user privileges for that session. Is there a way around that? How
> can I get the admin
> privileges for that session?
Nevermind. I found the answer from Corinna w
When a user with administrative privileges logs in to sshd, it seems that the
user is only granted
standard user privileges for that session. Is there a way around that? How
can I get the admin
privileges for that session?
Cygwin 1.7.9, Windows 7 Home Premium. I've created a user accou
Remote Desktop session
with non-admin privileges
Larry:
Thank you for your help.
Best regards,
Jayant Moghe
===
Texas Instruments (I) Pvt. Ltd.
Bagmane Tech Park, CV Raman Nagar, Byrasandra
Bangalore - India 560 093
Office Phone: - +91- 80 - 25048295
[EMAIL PROTECTED
@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Help !!! - Problem running Cygwin in Remote Desktop session
with non-admin privileges
On May 9 17:15, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
> How to confirm whether Cygwin 1.5.16 has been installed?
>
> Is it uname -a command?
Did you consider to *try* it?
Corinna
--
Corinna
!!! - Problem running Cygwin in Remote Desktop session
with non-admin privileges
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 02:39:28PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On May 9 17:15, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
>> How to confirm whether Cygwin 1.5.16 has been installed?
>>
>> Is it uname -a command?
>
&
sian Chancellor.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 9:59 PM
To: Moghe, Jayant; cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: RE: Help !!! - Problem running Cygwin in Remote Desktop session
with non-admin privileges
At 08:24 AM 5/10/2005, you wrote:
>
At 08:24 AM 5/10/2005, you wrote:
>I want to download Cygwin 1.5.16.
>
>Please let me know which mirror site hosts this version.
>
>Thanks.
Any mirror sites offered by 'setup.exe' are all considered to be active
mirrors. If your favorite one doesn't have the update you want, please
check to mak
sian Chancellor.
-Original Message-
From: Moghe, Jayant
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 12:12 PM
To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
Subject: RE: Help !!! - Problem running Cygwin in Remote Desktop session
with non-admin privil
Desktop session
with non-admin privileges
On May 9 17:15, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
> How to confirm whether Cygwin 1.5.16 has been installed?
>
> Is it uname -a command?
Did you consider to *try* it?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 02:39:28PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On May 9 17:15, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
>> How to confirm whether Cygwin 1.5.16 has been installed?
>>
>> Is it uname -a command?
>
>Did you consider to *try* it?
bash: it: command not found
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cy
On May 9 17:15, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
> How to confirm whether Cygwin 1.5.16 has been installed?
>
> Is it uname -a command?
Did you consider to *try* it?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin
ession
with non-admin privileges
On Apr 29 15:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 29 18:50, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
> > I there any way where I can avail paid support?
>
> Sure, but isn't it easier to report your problem somewhat more
detailed
> and see if you get a free (as in
Cliff Hones wrote:
>
> Note - I've tried this on two systems, with setup v2.457.2.1 and v2.457.2.2.
> In both cases I had a cygwin package earlier than 1.5.15 installed.
>
> Just tried again - selecting "Keep" is not necessary - just go straight
> to the Cygwin version selector. It shows 1.5.16
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:52:37AM +0530, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
>
>>Corinna:
>>
>>I have been facing problems in downloading Cygwin 1.5.16. Can you please
>>suggest a mirror site where this is available?
>
> 1.5.16 is available at every mirror site displayed by setup.ex
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:52:37AM +0530, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
>Corinna:
>
>I have been facing problems in downloading Cygwin 1.5.16. Can you please
>suggest a mirror site where this is available?
1.5.16 is available at every mirror site displayed by setup.exe.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http
On May 3 10:52, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
> Corinna:
You don't have to ask me personally. You can ask the whole mailing list.
It's *that* easy.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, I
: Friday, April 29, 2005 7:15 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Help !!! - Problem running Cygwin in Remote Desktop session
with non-admin privileges
On Apr 29 15:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 29 18:50, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
> > I there any way where I can avail paid support?
>
in Remote Desktop session
with non-admin privileges
On Apr 29 15:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 29 18:50, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
> > I there any way where I can avail paid support?
>
> Sure, but isn't it easier to report your problem somewhat more
detailed
> and see i
Remote Desktop session
with non-admin privileges
Moghe, Jayant wrote:
> Corinna:
>
> Thank you for your response. Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> May I know, normally, how long does it take to respond to a query?
>
> Since this is for the first time I have posted my query,
Moghe, Jayant wrote:
Corinna:
Thank you for your response. Sorry for the inconvenience.
May I know, normally, how long does it take to respond to a query?
Since this is for the first time I have posted my query, I am not
aware of quite a few processes that need to be followed. Am I missing
someth
On Apr 29 15:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 29 18:50, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
> > I there any way where I can avail paid support?
>
> Sure, but isn't it easier to report your problem somewhat more detailed
> and see if you get a free (as in "free beer") reply within a couple of
> days?
For the
On Apr 29 18:50, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
> I there any way where I can avail paid support?
Sure, but isn't it easier to report your problem somewhat more detailed
and see if you get a free (as in "free beer") reply within a couple of
days?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send
Desktop session
with non-admin privileges
On Apr 29 18:43, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
>
> Corinna:
>
> Thank you for your response. Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> May I know, normally, how long does it take to respond to a query?
>
> Since this is for the first time I ha
On Apr 29 18:43, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
>
> Corinna:
>
> Thank you for your response. Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> May I know, normally, how long does it take to respond to a query?
>
> Since this is for the first time I have posted my query, I am not aware
> of quite a few processes that ne
.
Regards,
Jayant
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Corinna Vinschen
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 5:35 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Help !!! - Problem running Cygwin in Remote Desktop session
with non-admin privileges
On Apr 29 17:16
On Apr 29 17:16, Moghe, Jayant wrote:
>
> Hello!!
>
> I have installed "cygwin-1.5.15-1" on windows 2000 server.
>
> When I logon locally, the installation works fine with admin as well as
> non admin privileges.
>
> When I connect to the server using
Hello!!
I have installed "cygwin-1.5.15-1" on windows 2000 server.
When I logon locally, the installation works fine with admin as well as
non admin privileges.
When I connect to the server using remote desktop utility (MSTSC) on my
laptop (WinXP SP1 / 2) with non-admin privileges
Original Message
>From: Moghe, Jayant
>Sent: 28 April 2005 12:38
> Hello!!
>
> I have installed "cygwin-1.5.15-1" on windows 2000 server.
>
> When I logon locally, the installation works fine with admin as well as
> non admin privileges.
>
> W
Hello!!
I have installed "cygwin-1.5.15-1" on windows 2000 server.
When I logon locally, the installation works fine with admin as well as
non admin privileges.
When I connect to the server using remote desktop utility (MSTSC) on my
laptop (WinXP SP1 / 2) with non-admin privileges
Hello!!
I have installed "cygwin-1.5.15-1" on windows 2000 server.
When I logon locally, the installation works fine with admin as well as
non admin privileges.
When I connect to the server using remote desktop utility (MSTSC) on my
laptop (WinXP SP1 / 2) with non-admin privileges
At Friday, February 18, 2005 10:37 AM, Jones, Jeff A. OPNAV wrote:
> My company places extreme limits on how much "root" access I have
> to my computer. Is there anyway to install cygwin without such
> access?
>
> When I attempt to run "setup.exe" I get the following message:
> This operatio
At 07:36 AM 2/18/2005, you wrote:
My company places extreme limits on how much "root" acccess I have to
my computer. Is there anyway to install cygwin without such access?
When I attempt to run "setup.exe" I get the following message:
This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in e
My company places extreme limits on how much "root" acccess I have to my
computer. Is there anyway to install cygwin without such access?
When I attempt to run "setup.exe" I get the following message:
This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this
computer. Please c
89 matches
Mail list logo
