Re: UPDATE: Active FTP Issue with inetutils 1.5

2009-03-10 Thread Curt Gran (crazykz)
>I'm currently in the process of rebuilding all of "my" packages; >inetutils is on the list and I'm making good progress plowing through >that list. So, I should be able to get to it soon; most likely within >the next week or two. > >Thank you for doing such a thorough job tracking this down. I saw

Re: UPDATE: Active FTP Issue with inetutils 1.5

2009-03-09 Thread Charles Wilson
Curt Gran (crazykz) wrote: > I did some more research this week reading though RFC959 about FTP and > have determined that the active data connection initiated from the > server must be port 20 if your FTP daemon is running on port 21. The > RFC refers to the control port as "L". Later in the doc

Re: UPDATE: Active FTP Issue with inetutils 1.5

2009-03-09 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 03/09/2009, Curt Gran (crazykz) wrote: Could someone help me understand how we might be able to get this fix into cygwin or when it could be available for download? I think you've done your due diligence by reporting the problem and the likely fix (with patch). It is up to the Cygwin mainta

UPDATE: Active FTP Issue with inetutils 1.5

2009-03-09 Thread Curt Gran (crazykz)
Hi, I did some more research this week reading though RFC959 about FTP and have determined that the active data connection initiated from the server must be port 20 if your FTP daemon is running on port 21. The RFC refers to the control port as "L". Later in the document L is stated as equal to

Re: Active FTP Issue with inetutils 1.5

2009-03-04 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 03/04/2009, Curt Gran (crazykz) wrote: I apologize if this should be in the apps list and not here but it seems like it might get more views here. I don't have any insight into your problem but I wanted to respond to this. I'm not singling your out, Curt. This just brings up a topic that's

Active FTP Issue with inetutils 1.5

2009-03-04 Thread Curt Gran (crazykz)
Hi, I apologize if this should be in the apps list and not here but it seems like it might get more views here. Let me preface this by saying that I have done some research and sniffing of this from both sides on a few machines (all windows 32 or 64 bit) and have seen the same thing on them all.