Thrall, Bryan wrote on 2010-01-21:
> Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote on 2010-01-20:
>> On 20/01/2010 15:39, Reini Urban wrote:
>>> Do you need Win32 native Tk or just x Tk? My patch was just to support
>>> Win32 Tk. I have no time for this in the next month.
>>
>> Nor should you need to. I maintain the
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote on 2010-01-20:
> On 20/01/2010 15:39, Reini Urban wrote:
>> Do you need Win32 native Tk or just x Tk?
>> My patch was just to support Win32 Tk. I have no time for this in the
>> next month.
>
> Nor should you need to. I maintain the perl-Tk package, and we use the
> X11 i
On 20/01/2010 15:39, Reini Urban wrote:
Do you need Win32 native Tk or just x Tk?
My patch was just to support Win32 Tk. I have no time for this in the
next month.
Nor should you need to. I maintain the perl-Tk package, and we use the
X11 interface because this is Cygwin, not ActivePerl.
x
Thrall, Bryan schrieb:
RE: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-07/msg00890.html
Reini Urban wrote:
2009/7/24 Wolfgang Goetz:
http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Tk+804.028_501
ohjeh.. perl 5.8.8 is yellow for cygwin.
there seems to be no interest at all for the moment.
I had some spare time som
RE: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-07/msg00890.html
Reini Urban wrote:
>2009/7/24 Wolfgang Goetz:
http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Tk+804.028_501
ohjeh.. perl 5.8.8 is yellow for cygwin.
there seems to be no interest at all for the moment.
>>>
>>> I had some spare time some tim
5 matches
Mail list logo
