Re: 3.2.0-1: possible regression Cygwin DDL bug (W10) when using multiple pipes

2021-04-30 Thread M2 via Cygwin
On 29/04/2021 01:39, Takashi Yano wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 22:17:44 +0200 M2 via Cygwin wrote: On 28/04/2021 16:36, Takashi Yano wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:38:13 +0200 M2 via Cygwin wrote: Hi, I found a possible regression issue between cygwin 3.1.7-1 and 3.2.0-1. The issue happens wit

Re: 3.2.0-1: possible regression Cygwin DDL bug (W10) when using multiple pipes

2021-04-28 Thread Takashi Yano via Cygwin
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 22:17:44 +0200 M2 via Cygwin wrote: > On 28/04/2021 16:36, Takashi Yano wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:38:13 +0200 > > M2 via Cygwin wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I found a possible regression issue between cygwin 3.1.7-1 and 3.2.0-1. > >> > >> The issue happens with "short" output

Re: 3.2.0-1: possible regression Cygwin DDL bug (W10) when using multiple pipes

2021-04-28 Thread M2 via Cygwin
On 28/04/2021 16:36, Takashi Yano wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:38:13 +0200 M2 via Cygwin wrote: Hi, I found a possible regression issue between cygwin 3.1.7-1 and 3.2.0-1. The issue happens with "short" output in multiple piping, such as the following example: dir | grep c | sed "s/^/f

Re: 3.2.0-1: possible regression Cygwin DDL bug (W10) when using multiple pipes

2021-04-28 Thread Takashi Yano via Cygwin
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:38:13 +0200 M2 via Cygwin wrote: > Hi, > I found a possible regression issue between cygwin 3.1.7-1 and 3.2.0-1. > > The issue happens with "short" output in multiple piping, such as the > following example: > > dir | grep c | sed "s/^/foo/" | sed "s/oo/OO/" > > (the