On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 07:40:31PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:32:23 -0500
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Please stop this off-topic discussion. Warning #1.
>I'll stop if you do. Warning #1.
Ok, so long then.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simp
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:22:05 -0500
Dave Korn wrote:
> How frequently you notice it may be different from how frequently other
> people notice it, hopefully in proportion to whether you are more or less of a
> jerk than whichever other people you choose to compare yourself against.
You seemed to
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:32:23 -0500
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Please stop this off-topic discussion. Warning #1.
I'll stop if you do. Warning #1.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 07:05:05PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:33:53 -0500
>Greg Freemyer wrote:
>>A lot of Linux mailing lists have that policy. Especially if it is
>>high volume or has a large subscriber base. The idea is that someone
>>can read a single email and understand
rhubbell wrote:
> I was mostly noticing how frequent the "list policing" is here.
How frequently you notice it may be different from how frequently other
people notice it, hopefully in proportion to whether you are more or less of a
jerk than whichever other people you choose to compare yoursel
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:33:53 -0500
Greg Freemyer wrote:
> A lot of Linux mailing lists have that policy. Especially if it is
> high volume or has a large subscriber base. The idea is that someone
> can read a single email and understand it without having to bounce all
> over the place.
I was mo
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 04:44:58PM -0600, Ben Kamen wrote:
> Greg Freemyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:35 PM, rhubbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:15:33 -0500
>>> Greg Chicares wrote:
By the way, this list discourages full quoting:
http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
>>>
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:45:21 -0500
Ben Kamen wrote:
> What still always makes me laugh is the people who are so emphatic about top
> vs. bottom posting.
If born sooner they would be shouting "Get of my lawn!".
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:12:00 -0500
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>
> Thanks for sharing. Well, of course, if this bothers you to some great
> extent, you need not stay. We won't follow you home. Promise! :-)
Thank you too for sharing. (^:
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscri
rhubbell wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:15:33 -0500
Greg Chicares wrote:
By the way, this list discourages full quoting:
http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
Ok, this is one neurotic list.
Thanks for sharing. Well, of course, if this bothers you to some great
extent, you need not stay. W
Ben Kamen wrote:
But what made me laugh about the .sig was that it missed something.
it said something along the idea of:
Because it just does.
Why.
Yes.
So, does that make it evil?
because it reverses the flow of discussion.
why is top posting evil?
I had to laugh when I saw this!
In any
Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:35 PM, rhubbell wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:15:33 -0500
Greg Chicares wrote:
By the way, this list discourages full quoting:
http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
Ok, this is one neurotic list.
A lot of Linux mailing lists have that policy
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:35 PM, rhubbell wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:15:33 -0500
> Greg Chicares wrote:
>> By the way, this list discourages full quoting:
>> http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
>
> Ok, this is one neurotic list.
A lot of Linux mailing lists have that policy. Especially i
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:15:33 -0500
Greg Chicares wrote:
> By the way, this list discourages full quoting:
> http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
Ok, this is one neurotic list.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.h
On 2009-02-24 20:36Z, rhubbell wrote:
> What's the [CFT] stand for?
> Call For Test?
Yes. He spelled it out:
>> CALL FOR TEST
By the way, this list discourages full quoting:
http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simp
What's the [CFT] stand for?
Call For Test?
Are you requesting test volunteers?
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:01:19 -0500
Charles Wilson wrote:
> The most recent release of libtool (2.2.7a-1 for cygwin-1.5, and
> 2.2.7a-10 for cygwin-1.7) ought to support cross builds at least as well
> as libtool-1.5
The most recent release of libtool (2.2.7a-1 for cygwin-1.5, and
2.2.7a-10 for cygwin-1.7) ought to support cross builds at least as well
as libtool-1.5 did. Note that in *ordinary* cross builds (SomeBUILD ->
SomeHOST) you can't run the $host executables on the $build machine --
but you can still
17 matches
Mail list logo
