Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1

2003-10-02 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 01:22:03PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:50:14PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > > > > I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one w

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1

2003-10-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 01:22:03PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:50:14PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > > > I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one we can contact. > > > > What do you mean? Links has a

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1

2003-10-02 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:50:14PM -0300, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote: > > I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one we can contact. > > What do you mean? Links has a Cygwin maintainer at least. If you mean one who contributed a package almost 2

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1

2003-10-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
uot; is not much of information... > BTW, the Subject is wrong. "Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: > openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1". Should be 0.9.7c-1. Yes, I missed to change it. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1

2003-10-01 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
til the packages are updated. I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one we can contact. And the new releases don't work well with Cygwin. BTW, the Subject is wrong. "Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1". Should be 0.9.7c-1. -- How to contact

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1

2003-10-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:28:10AM +0200, Patrick Eisenacher wrote: > Corinna, > > is there an easy way to find out whether I still have a package > installed that needs the openssl 0.9.6x compatibility package? I would > love to get rid of this thing. The packages still using 0.9.6 so far are

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1

2003-10-01 Thread Patrick Eisenacher
Corinna, is there an easy way to find out whether I still have a package installed that needs the openssl 0.9.6x compatibility package? I would love to get rid of this thing. Patrick There will be no 0.9.6j compatibility package anymore. The 0.9.6 package is only kept for backward compatibili

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1

2003-09-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
I've updated the version of OpenSSL to 0.9.7c-1. This also includes the openssl-devel package. This is a bugfix and security update. The Cygwin version matches the official source tree except for a minor tweak in the top level Makefile. ==