RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libtool-devel-20030216, libltdl-20030216

2003-02-28 Thread Ralf Habacker
> It's up to you -- that's why I coded the libtool changes so that your > improvements could be a "drop in" fix. I think it'd be "nice" is file > could tell me that a given file was an import lib or a (regular) lib, > but it isn't necessary. > > There's certainly no rush. I will see. The problem i

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libtool-devel-20030216, libltdl-20030216

2003-02-25 Thread Charles Wilson
Ralf Habacker wrote: o speed problem with the internal "win32_libid()" routine is partially fixed -- approx 35% speedup. Ralf Habacker is working on some modifications to the official fileutils distribution (specifically, file.exe) that should allow an additional 8% speedup without additional chan

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libtool-devel-20030216, libltdl-20030216

2003-02-25 Thread Ralf Habacker
> o speed problem with the internal "win32_libid()" routine is partially > fixed -- approx 35% speedup. Ralf Habacker is working on some > modifications to the official fileutils distribution (specifically, > file.exe) that should allow an additional 8% speedup without additional > changes to lib

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libtool-devel-20030216, libltdl-20030216

2003-02-22 Thread Charles Wilson
libtool-devel has been updated to the 20030216 CVS codebase, as well as libltdl3. The 20030216 release has been in 'test' for a week, with no ill effects -- save a known problem with wacky pseudo-cross-compiler setups (see 'Open issue' below). Note that libtool-devel-20030103 depends on autoco