Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gnupg-1.4.12-1

2012-05-16 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 16 May 2012 16:24, marco atzeri wrote: > On 5/16/2012 10:15 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> It isn't zlib (no binaries) or even zlib0 (cygcheck /usr/bin/cygz.dll >> doesn't show libreadline 6 or 7). >> >> Why are we still linking against libreadline6 instead of libreadline7? >> Is there a hint file tha

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gnupg-1.4.12-1

2012-05-16 Thread marco atzeri
On 5/16/2012 10:15 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 05/16/2012 02:08 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: On 16 May 2012 15:19, marco atzeri wrote: On 5/16/2012 9:12 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: Every command / option I try with gpg comes back with a 'Bad address' error: $ gpg --version mksh: gpg: Bad address A

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gnupg-1.4.12-1

2012-05-16 Thread Eric Blake
On 05/16/2012 02:08 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > On 16 May 2012 15:19, marco atzeri wrote: >> On 5/16/2012 9:12 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >>> Every command / option I try with gpg comes back with a 'Bad address' >>> error: >>> >>> $ gpg --version >>> mksh: gpg: Bad address >>> >>> Am I missing som

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gnupg-1.4.12-1

2012-05-16 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 16 May 2012 15:19, marco atzeri wrote: > On 5/16/2012 9:12 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> Every command / option I try with gpg comes back with a 'Bad address' >> error: >> >> $ gpg --version >> mksh: gpg: Bad address >> >> Am I missing something? > > $ cygcheck gpg Ah, should have thought of th

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gnupg-1.4.12-1

2012-05-16 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 16 May 2012 15:19, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On 2012-05-16 14:12, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> Every command / option I try with gpg comes back with a 'Bad address' >> error: >> >> $ gpg --version >> mksh: gpg: Bad address >> >> Am I missing something? > > Is cygserver running? Is it required? C

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gnupg-1.4.12-1

2012-05-16 Thread marco atzeri
On 5/16/2012 9:12 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: On 28 February 2012 10:02, marco atzeri wrote: New version 1.4.12-1 of gnupg is available in the Cygwin distribution: Every command / option I try with gpg comes back with a 'Bad address' error: $ gpg --version mksh: gpg: Bad address Am

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gnupg-1.4.12-1

2012-05-16 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2012-05-16 14:12, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: On 28 February 2012 10:02, marco atzeri wrote: New version 1.4.12-1 of gnupg is available in the Cygwin distribution: Every command / option I try with gpg comes back with a 'Bad address' error: $ gpg --version mksh: gpg: Bad address Am

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gnupg-1.4.12-1

2012-05-16 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 28 February 2012 10:02, marco atzeri wrote: > New version 1.4.12-1  of > >        gnupg > > is available in the Cygwin distribution: Every command / option I try with gpg comes back with a 'Bad address' error: $ gpg --version mksh: gpg: Bad address Am I missing something? Chris -- Chris Su

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gnupg-1.4.12-1

2012-02-28 Thread marco atzeri
New version 1.4.12-1 of gnupg is available in the Cygwin distribution: CHANGES This is the last 1.4.x mainstream release Full changes: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2012q1/000313.html DESCRIPTION The GNU Privacy Guard GnuPG is the GNU complete and free implementat