Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc 3.3.3-1, gcc-mingw-20030911-2 missing java headers

2003-10-04 Thread Jim Kleckner
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:07:54PM -0700, Jim Kleckner wrote: Is it possible the java code simply wasn't configured to build? All of the java headers are missing. Christopher Faylor wrote: I've moved all of the latest gcc stuff out of "test" and into "current". This

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc 3.3.3-1, gcc-mingw-20030911-2 missing java headers

2003-10-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:07:54PM -0700, Jim Kleckner wrote: >Is it possible the java code simply wasn't configured to build? >All of the java headers are missing. > >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>I've moved all of the latest gcc stuff out of "test" and into "current". >>This is the standard gcc 3

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc 3.3.3-1, gcc-mingw-20030911-2 missing java headers

2003-10-03 Thread Jim Kleckner
Jim Kleckner wrote: ... I tried uncompressing, configuring, and "make" of gcc. Recompiling and installing 3.3.1-1 fails to install the headers. Subsequent uncompress, configure, recompile of 3.2-3 failed to compiler. To be clear, the install ofo 3.3.1-1 succeeds but it doesn't appear that the in

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc 3.3.3-1, gcc-mingw-20030911-2 missing java headers

2003-10-03 Thread Jim Kleckner
Is it possible the java code simply wasn't configured to build? All of the java headers are missing. Christopher Faylor wrote: I've moved all of the latest gcc stuff out of "test" and into "current". This is the standard gcc 3.3.1 release from gcc.gnu.org + patches from Danny Smith and (to a vastl