Re: tetex maintainer take note (was Re: setup.hint coreutils editing (was: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: coreutils-5.2.1-3))

2005-01-24 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Christopher Faylor writes: > I've nuked the offending items. Thanks. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem rep

tetex maintainer take note (was Re: setup.hint coreutils editing (was: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: coreutils-5.2.1-3))

2005-01-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:18:18PM -0500, Steve Munson wrote: >On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:45:07 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Yes, good point. I've swept through the setup.hints, changed all of the >> fileutils|sh-utils|textutils to 'coreutils', and removed duplicates. >> ... >> AFAICT, my list

Re: setup.hint coreutils editing (was: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: coreutils-5.2.1-3)

2005-01-23 Thread Steve Munson
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:45:07 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Yes, good point. I've swept through the setup.hints, changed all of the > fileutils|sh-utils|textutils to 'coreutils', and removed duplicates. > ... > AFAICT, my list coincided with yours so everything should be up-to-date > now. Ac

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: coreutils-5.2.1-3

2004-12-23 Thread Corinna Vinschen
I have uploaded coreutils-5.2.1-3. This package superseeds the packages fileutils, sh-utils and textutils. Changes since 5.2.1-2: - cp(1) always copies in binary mode. - ln(1) can hardlink executables even if the .exe suffix is missing on the command line like this: $ ls -l foo* -rwx