Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: clamav-0.80-2

Morche Matthias schrieb: Is the expected behaviour of clamscan to avoid scanning the root directory as shown below? $ clamscan -v -r / Certainly not. Thanks for the report! Clearly a clamscan bug. (Still < 1.0) $ clamscan -v // ///.bash_history: Access denied. Scanning ///.rnd ///.rnd: OK Scanning

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: clamav-0.80-2

Is the expected behaviour of clamscan to avoid scanning the root directory as shown below? $ clamscan -v -r / --- SCAN SUMMARY --- Known viruses: 25864 Scanned directories: 1 Scanned files: 0 Infected files: 0 Data scanned: 0.00 MB I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes Time: 0.940 sec (0

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: clamav-0.80-2

I have updated the version of clamav on cygwin.com to 0.80-2. This fixes only a minor problem with the patch in the src package, as reported here: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-10/msg01222.html The binary package is effectively the same. Note: There seem to be some bugs with clamd, wh