Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.3.39-2

2016-08-05 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/28/2015 08:56 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 09/28/2015 08:30 AM, Mikhail Usenko wrote: > >> But catching that bug (in upstream?) hasn't changed anything >> at least on my installation: > > Okay, I can see the disappearing \r even on a binary mount, so it > appears to be unrelated to the fix f

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.3.39-2

2015-09-28 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/28/2015 10:48 AM, Mikhail Usenko wrote: > On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:56:14 -0600 > Eric Blake <...> wrote: >> >> 'echo -n' and 'echo -e' are non-portable (even in bash; because I can >> use 'shopt -s xpgecho' to get POSIX-mandated behavior). Use 'printf' >> instead. >> > > xpg_echo doesn't chan

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.3.39-2

2015-09-28 Thread Mikhail Usenko
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:56:14 -0600 Eric Blake <...> wrote: > > 'echo -n' and 'echo -e' are non-portable (even in bash; because I can > use 'shopt -s xpgecho' to get POSIX-mandated behavior). Use 'printf' > instead. > xpg_echo doesn't change 'echo -ne' behavior ('echo -e' force backslash-escape

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.3.39-2

2015-09-28 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/28/2015 09:04 AM, Tim Higgins wrote: > Team > When I run startx I get the following error. > higginst@HigginsT-LT-W7 ~ > $ startx > And this is related to bash, how? Please don't top-post or commandeer unrelated threads. If you have an unrelated question, start a new thread. > > > CON

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.3.39-2

2015-09-28 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/28/2015 08:30 AM, Mikhail Usenko wrote: > But catching that bug (in upstream?) hasn't changed anything > at least on my installation: Okay, so it sounds like your issue is separate. > > ---%<--%<--- > #! /bin/bash > bash -version | head -n1 > echo > > sender() > { > echo -n '\r\n'

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.3.39-2

2015-09-28 Thread Mikhail Usenko
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 15:10:25 -0600 Eric Blake <...> wrote: > On 06/04/2015 03:51 AM, Mikhail Usenko wrote: > > Eric Blake (cygwin) <...> wrote: > >> 4.3.39-2 > > > > Hello, Eric. > > It has the same issue as in the previous version: > > eating one \r from the odd numbered chains of the \r. > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.3.39-2

2015-09-24 Thread Eric Blake
On 06/04/2015 03:51 AM, Mikhail Usenko wrote: > Eric Blake (cygwin) <...> wrote: >> 4.3.39-2 > > Hello, Eric. > It has the same issue as in the previous version: > eating one \r from the odd numbered chains of the \r. > Please try the (currently-experimental) 4.3.42-4, which should fix the issue

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.3.39-2

2015-06-04 Thread Eric Blake
On 06/04/2015 03:51 AM, Mikhail Usenko wrote: > Eric Blake (cygwin) <...> wrote: >> 4.3.39-2 > > Hello, Eric. > It has the same issue as in the previous version: > eating one \r from the odd numbered chains of the \r. Yes, I know there are still \r issues, although I appreciate the test case as I

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.3.39-2

2015-06-04 Thread Mikhail Usenko
Eric Blake (cygwin) <...> wrote: > 4.3.39-2 Hello, Eric. It has the same issue as in the previous version: eating one \r from the odd numbered chains of the \r. bash-4.3.39-2 - $ echo -ne "\r\n" | { read t; echo "$t"; } | od -tx1 000 0a 001 $ echo -ne "\r\r\n" | { read t; echo

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.3.39-2

2015-06-03 Thread Eric Blake (cygwin)
A new release of bash, 4.3.39-2, has been uploaded and will soon reach a mirror near you; leaving 4.3.33-1 as the previous version. NEWS: = This is my second build of bash 4.3 for cygwin, incorporating several new upstream official patches and working around a change in make 4.1 VPATH behavior