Re: /proc functionality; ls errors

2005-02-05 Thread linda w
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Feb 1 22:00, linda w wrote: I've tried twice to build from CVS, but never seem to have gotten a full build to run w/no errors (not to mention having a woefully inadequate machine to build such a project on...(sigh)). Did you read http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SE

Re: /proc functionality; ls errors

2005-02-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 2 12:22, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:28:04AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Did you read http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC104 lately? Otherwise, > >as Brian wrote, try a snapshot. > > I thought that section was designed for punishment, not information. >

Re: /proc functionality; ls errors

2005-02-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:28:04AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Feb 1 22:00, linda w wrote: >> Cool - does that mean it was a bug and was fixed, or did it just >> happen to disappear due to some other improvement? Either way... > >It was a bug which just didn't show up with ls from the old

Re: /proc functionality; ls errors

2005-02-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 1 22:00, linda w wrote: > Cool - does that mean it was a bug and was fixed, or did it just > happen to disappear due to some other improvement? Either way... It was a bug which just didn't show up with ls from the old fileutils. > 'bout how long does it take till things go from CVS to a

Re: /proc functionality; ls errors

2005-02-01 Thread Brian Dessent
linda w wrote: > > Cool - does that mean it was a bug and was fixed, or did it just > happen to disappear due to some other improvement? Either way... I think that the functionality did not exist before, and Corinna added it. So, not a bug, just things that weren't implemented yet. I suspect t

Re: /proc functionality; ls errors

2005-02-01 Thread linda w
Cool - does that mean it was a bug and was fixed, or did it just happen to disappear due to some other improvement? Either way... 'bout how long does it take till things go from CVS to a release, these days. I've tried twice to build from CVS, but never seem to have gotten a full build to run w/n

Re: /proc functionality; ls errors

2005-01-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 29 14:12, linda w wrote: > Had another Question regarding the /proc file system. If > I am in /proc (Cygwin Window, bash) and I type the > command "'ls' -l" I get: > /proc> 'ls' -l > ls: loadavg: Operation not permitted > [...] Should be fixed in current CVS. Corinna -- Corinna Vinsche

/proc functionality; ls errors

2005-01-29 Thread linda w
Had another Question regarding the /proc file system. If I am in /proc (Cygwin Window, bash) and I type the command "'ls' -l" I get: /proc> 'ls' -l ls: loadavg: Operation not permitted ls: meminfo: Operation not permitted ls: registry: Operation not permitted ls: stat: Operation not permitted ls: