Re: symlink extension shown using 1.5.3

2003-09-11 Thread stmoebius
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:30:32PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > What type are the remote shares, Samba or Windows? > > How can I tell? > > OS of remote machine? Win2k (stated in the very first mail - therefore my confusion ;-) -- = Stefan Moebius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Witte

Re: symlink extension shown using 1.5.3

2003-09-10 Thread stmoebius
Just noticed there is a difference between 'ls -l simulator' and 'ls -l simulator.lnk'. The former actually shows only 'simulator', not 'simulator.lnk' as 'ls -l' does. So here is the strace of 'ls -l simulator.lnk' -- = Stefan Moebius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wittenberger Str. 71+49

Re: symlink extension shown using 1.5.3

2003-09-10 Thread stmoebius
> What type are the remote shares, Samba or Windows? How can I tell? > Please send an strace of `ls -l '. ...is attached -- = Stefan Moebius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wittenberger Str. 71+49 351 8473953 01309 Dresden +49 172 8739617 strace.txt.bz2 Description: Binary data

Re: symlink extension shown using 1.5.3

2003-09-09 Thread stmoebius
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 12:05:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Since I updated to cygwin 1.5.3 and bash 2.0.5b13, symlinks *on* network > > drives are shown by ls including the '.lnk'. They are properly > recognized as > > symlinks and it is even possible to, e.g., change the directory us

symlink extension shown using 1.5.3

2003-09-09 Thread stmoebius
Since I updated to cygwin 1.5.3 and bash 2.0.5b13, symlinks *on* network drives are shown by ls including the '.lnk'. They are properly recognized as symlinks and it is even possible to, e.g., change the directory using only the link name (without '.lnk'). Symlinks on local drives are shown just f