Re: mk_all

2011-05-20 Thread kathy3826
>No, my guess is that you used mk_all when you should have used ./mk_all >and that shows the real problem. That wasn't the problem. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/mk_all-tp31655700p31665937.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem

Re: mk_all

2011-05-20 Thread kathy3826
Thanks guys, it must have been make all. And it seems I can bypass the one with x windows using source code. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/mk_all-tp31655700p31662386.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http:/

Re: mk_all

2011-05-19 Thread kathy3826
It is from online lectures on starting one program, I typed make all and it says it compiled successfully, but it misses X Windows. marco atzeri-4 wrote: > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:51 PM, kathy3826 wrote: >> >> what do you suggest i use? > > to do what ? >

Re: mk_all

2011-05-19 Thread kathy3826
;> should exist in cygwin? >> >> >> Csaba Raduly-2 wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:07 PM, kathy3826  wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> when i type mk_all command cygwin returns: >>>> -bash:

Re: mk_all

2011-05-19 Thread kathy3826
because there should be such command in unix einvironment, so its equivalent or the same one should exist in cygwin? Csaba Raduly-2 wrote: > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:07 PM, kathy3826 wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> when i type mk_all command cygwin returns: >&

mk_all

2011-05-19 Thread kathy3826
Hi all, when i type mk_all command cygwin returns: -bash: mk_all: command not found I thought i have to download some packages, perhaps someone can tell me which? or is it something else. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/mk_all-tp31655700p31655700.html Sent from th