On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 04:59:57PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> If you are a nontechnical cygwin user, then why would you be making
> any determination of what is harmless or not harmless? I would think
> that it would be the reverse -- people who really know what they're
> doing (or think
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:45:37PM +, John M. Adams wrote:
> How do you get just 1 package via setup.exe?
When you reach the Select Packages dialog of setup.exe, hit the View
button (the tiny one on the upper-right...). In the table there is a
column called "New" (I don't know why it's calle
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 07:50:48AM +1100, andrew clarke wrote:
> Section 2 of the FAQ might also put people off using Setup because it's
> described as a "work-in-progress" and seemingly a bit of a moving target.
Actually, just out of interest, will new Setup progra
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:15:05PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> > I don't think people are actually reading that paragraph at all, though. I
> > think that's part of the problem.
>
> As a preventative measure, how about adding some embedded tags into the
> cygwin.com home or install pages so
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:26:15PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I tried an experiment recently where I turned on ftp access to the
> cygwin download directory on sources.redhat.com. The result seemed
> to be that people started downloading cygwin's package .tar.bz2 files
> directly and (som
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:34:18PM -0500, bob davis wrote:
> I just installed the latest cygwin 1.3.19-1 .
> When I run grep I get a dialog with missing cygprce.dll
> I run dumpbin on grep.exe and I can see the cygprce.dll import.
> It looks like a regular expression library. I have searched the m
6 matches
Mail list logo
