Re: LibFFI or LibVM? [was: Re: SableVM & Cygwin

2004-10-15 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Etienne" == Etienne Gagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Etienne> I am strongly opposed to the GCC Steering Committee (or whatever Etienne> delegates they have for libffi) position on rejecting contributions Etienne> to libffi without copyright assignment, which has considerably Etienne> slow

Re: LibFFI or LibVM? [was: Re: SableVM & Cygwin (was: Re: sablevm + windows)]

2004-10-15 Thread Tom Tromey
> ">" == Grzegorz B Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> They're also considering change of the license to a more >> restrictive one. False. Where did you hear this? Tom -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems

Re: gcc 3.3.1-3, loading .la files from gcj-compiled apps

2003-11-08 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Charles" == Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Charles> Hmm. I wonder if "The Right Thing To Do" is to ensure that libjava's Charles> version of ltdl.c is uptodate -- that is, taken from libtool-1.5 and Charles> not 1.4.x, and then rebuild libjava, the modules, etc. I think so. C

Re: gcc 3.3.1-3, loading .la files from gcj-compiled apps

2003-11-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Marcus" == Marcus G Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marcus> Would it be possible to add a -D_WIN32 to the libjava/libltdl Marcus> Makefile for Cygwin? It looks like it would be a bit more in line with existing code to just add it to libltdl/ltdl.h. Could you look at how the upstream l

Re: Object alignment, was: cygwin failures - assertion "!(addr & FLAGS)" failed:

2002-05-05 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Tim" == Tim Prince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tim> The binutils alignment parameter in coff-i386.c is set to 4-byte Tim> alignment. 4-byte alignment also is the default for gcc -Os, at Tim> least from gcc-3.1. Cases have been produced where gcc-3.1 Tim> failed to give 16-byte alignment

Re: Object alignment, was: cygwin failures - assertion "!(addr & FLAGS)" failed:

2002-05-05 Thread Tom Tromey
> "David" == Billinghurst, David (CRTS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> So we need objects to be 8-byte aligned so that the low three David> bits of the address are 0? Are there any ways around this, as David> I don't think that this is the default on cygwin. For libgcj this decision is