-Original Message-
A few months ago this did not happen (same building procedure).
___
You posted this several places, and they're still arriving. Apparently,
nothing has changed, except they've added this warning that the maintainers of
this librar
possibly out-dated gcc code? check your namespaces?
: undefined reference to `ostream::operator<<(char const*)
: undefined reference to `_cin'
: undefined reference to `_cout'
:undefined reference to `istream& operator>>(istream&, smanip const&)'
Tim Prince
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cy
I don't think you've defined your problem well enough to answer. Are you running a
single thread gcc program which mallocs memory until it fails? If you have multiple
CPUs and run multiple threads or multiple instances of your program, you might be able
to use more of the memory.
-Origina
If -mno-cygwin or mingw don't do what you want, you may be out of luck.
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 11:43:17 -0300
Subject: Re: How to compile static to avoid the need for cygwin1.dll
No, i'm not aware. Anyway i
-Original Message-
From: WINDOWS 98 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:43:26 -0400
Subject: patch.exe missing from cygwin? [Newbie]
Hi. Just installed Cygwin, looking for patch.exe. It has diff.exe, but
no patch! Any idea how I can get this utility?
__
-Original Message-
From: "peter garrone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:42:52 +0800
Subject: pthread_cond_timedwait accurate to one second only
Hi.
I would like to use this function down to 10 milliseconds accuracy if possible.
However upon looking at
-Original Message-
From: Mark Blackburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:08:04 -0400
Subject: Is profiling broken?
Whenever I try to compile with gcc -p I get "undefined reference to
`mcount'".
AFAIK, only -pg profiling is supported in cygwin, and it
I'm happy to end bash with an "exit" or ctrl-D to allow it to keep its records in
order. When "Windows cannot end..." you have the choice of killing it or winding it
up properly.
-Original Message-
From: "Richard Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Soren Andersen)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 16:04:11 -0400
Subject: sharing hd partition betw Linux and Cygwin
> By
default all files (dirs) mounted on this vfat - type filesystem under
Linux `mount' are set with perms rwxr--r--
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:34:41 -0500
Subject: Re: Big Brother is Real
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:28:14AM -0800, Tim Prince wrote:
>Lack of cygwin support has impeded the market penetration of Windows XP
-Original Message-
From: Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 07:34:20 -0800
Subject: Re: Big Brother is Real
Tim,
At 07:28 2003-04-03, you wrote:
>...
>
>Lack of cygwin support has impeded the market penetration of Windows
>XP64, but it seem
-Original Message-
From: "Stephan Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:37:19 -0800
Subject: RE: Big Brother is Real
Can someone elaborate on exactly which APIs have changed incompatibly
(in 64-bit Windows)?
I'm only mildly familiar with the 64-bi
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:15:08 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Added setup.exe to User's Guide
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:11:35PM -0500, Igor Pechtchans
-Original Message-
From: Vince Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Onur SOYSAL'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:02:29 -
Subject: RE: Problem with PVM on CYGWIN
Hmm well ssh will definately allow passwordless logins etc and as far as i
know rsh will too
fsplit can easily be built under cygwin from source. If there's any interest, I could
sign on as maintainer.
-Original Message-
From: Tyson Bourbina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:15:45 -0600
Subject: Re: fsplit problems
Thanks, you answered my ques
-Original Message-
From: Michael Talbot-Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Cygwin Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 10:52:45 +1030 (CST)
Subject: New user / CD installation problems
1. Cygwin is very slow. Remarkably so. I guess this might be just
how it is when
-Original Message-
From: wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:49:15 -0600
Subject: threads question
I was wondering what the current status of using threads are for
cygwin? I have a project that I am starting and am considering
using threads. The cl
-Original Message-
From: "Max Bowsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:26:12 -
Subject: Re: gcc as strictly win32 compiler
Sean McBride wrote:
>... as I understand it, cygwin.dll interprets many commands and
> uses MSVCRT.dll
-Original Message-
From: "Robert McNulty Junior" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Max Bowsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 18:37:37 -0600
Subject: RE: Cygwin 1.3.19-1
Max, I used Timidity, too. Compiled Fine.
With Gcc-3.2.2, before the changes today.
I'll go b
-Original Message-
From: "Lane, Frank L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cygwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:53:41 -0600
Subject: RE: posix threads
Hi Mike,
I don't know how the different version are cross-referenced but uname tells
me I'm running CYGWIN_NT-5.0. And the POSIX
-Original Message-
From: DEEPA SIVASANKARANE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:20:52 -0500
Subject: Re: Header File Package
release/cygwin contains almost all header files, but not
stddef.h
Could somebody please tell me under which folder it would be
-Original Message-
From: "Aaron Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:01:32 -
Subject: What is the difference between Cygwin and GCC releases ?
Hi,
Is Cygwin just a build of GCC or does it have a standard set of patches
applied, or are the patch
-Original Message-
From: "Timothy C Prince" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 08:18:08 +
Subject: Re: Re: __RUNTIME_PSEUDO_RELOC_LIST[_END]__ (1.3.18-1)
-Original Message-
From: Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
-Original Message-
From: Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tim Prince" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 23:08:21 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: __RUNTIME_PSEUDO_RELOC_LIST[_END]__ (1.3.18-1)
What we're you doing when these warning's came up? I guess the
compila
I've been looking unsuccessfully for an explanation of these undefined symbols in
libcygwin.a(pseudo-reloc.o). I take it this is a new "feature" of 1.3.18-1, but until
I see the usage explained, I guess I'll keep reverting to 1.3.17-1.
Tim Prince
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:52:49 -0500
Subject: poor performance -- is Cygwin to blame?..
Hello!
I have a PVM based distributed application. One of the set of computing
tasks is initially distributed to ea
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:52:49 -0500
Subject: poor performance -- is Cygwin to blame?..
Hello!
I have a PVM based distributed application. One of the set of computing
tasks is initially distributed to ea
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:52:49 -0500
Subject: poor performance -- is Cygwin to blame?..
Hello!
I have a PVM based distributed application. One of the set of computing
tasks is initially distributed to ea
-Original Message-
From: Christian Jönsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cygwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:51:52 +0100
Subject: dejagnu, expect and tcl in current cygwin?
I'm not quite sure here, but trying to run dejagnu's runtest gives me
an error:
$ runtest -V
Tcl_Init
29 matches
Mail list logo
