Re: distro "apache2" will not start

2010-09-17 Thread Stacey Campbell
I gave up on Cygwin apache2 some time ago, but under Windows 7 it had a tendency to crash the system in its default configuration. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-02/msg00017.html I've been using lighthttp since. Stacey -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: Fortune and the "fortune startrek" command

2010-06-22 Thread Stacey Campbell
Paraphrasing: >[C]haracter flaws [of Cygwin project participants] have nothing to do >with cygwin itself. I'd disagree with that. The Cygwin project is a volunteer effort, correct? Potential developers are more likely to volunteer if they see respect and cooperation on lists such as this. I'v

Apache2 crashing/degrading x64 Windows 7 system

2010-02-18 Thread Stacey Campbell
I reported this problem a while back. Out of the box Cygwin 1.7.1 Apache2 eventually brings down my Windows 7 Home quad core x86 system if httpd2 is subject to only a relatively light load. A workaround seems to be to heavily limit the number of processes (and sockets) used by Apache2. This

Re: emacs stalls using 100% CPU

2010-02-11 Thread Stacey Campbell
On Tue, February 9, 2010 "Rockefeller, Harry" wrote: > Intermittent problem. It's happening more often again. > NEW info, when top is run the memory columns (VIRT RES and SHR) data toggles > Back and forth for COMMAND "emacs-X11" and "XWin". See attached top log. > The situation is recoverable

Re: Fyi Apache2 notes: No space left on device / Cannot create SSLMutex

2010-02-01 Thread Stacey Campbell
On Mon, February 1, 2010 9:40:47 AM I wrote: > I run Cygwin apache2 on a low-ish volume site (about 30 unique visitors per > day, plus the never-ending stream of bots which all public sites serve) and > the latest - as of 30 Jan 2010 - Cygwin apache2 running on a new Windows 7 > x64 machine eventua

Re: Fyi Apache2 notes: No space left on device / Cannot create SSLMutex

2010-02-01 Thread Stacey Campbell
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:28:19 Christopher Faylor wrote: > I don't know that this site even uses Cygwin. They'd actually be pretty dumb > to use Cygwin's apache on a high-volume site like that so it probably is not > the case. I just thought it was an odd coincidence that I read about the same > pr