Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:10:05AM -0800, Peter Rehley wrote:
It seems like an improvement. It didn't hang, but after about 4000
iterations of the test script it got a segmentation fault. It ran
for 12 hours with another configure script in a separate window or
Christopher Faylor wrote:
It's also in the latest snapshot: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
I got the latest cygwin dll snapshot (20060227) a few days ago and I've
been stress testing ksh with this new dll since.
The good news is that the hang issues (signal related) that I was seeing
appear
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 03:22:05PM -0500, Paul Clements wrote:
OK, I think I see what is happening now:
set_signal_mask() does indeed call sig_dispatch_pending() to do a flush
when the signal mask changes. However, when the sigq is empty,
sig_dispatch_pending
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:40:33PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Actually, I spoke too soon. I don't understand your analysis.
> You make this statement:
>>However, if the queueing of the blocked signal happens right after the
>>signal mask change, then we miss the signal.
> but I don't u
4 matches
Mail list logo
