Re: 1.7 fork errors in Win7

nt processes. If so, then: How do I figure out what binaries don't need to be rebased and peflaged? Trial and error? Why not use rebaseall and peflagsall instead? Thanks, Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Luis P Caamano wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at

Re: 1.7 fork errors in Win7

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Eliot Moss, wrote > > Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:43:44 -0500 > Subject: Re: 1.7 fork errors in Win7 > Luis P Caamano wrote: >> >> I'm running 1.7.0-67 on Windows 7 64 bit: >> >> $ uname -v >> 2009-11-27 15:38 >>

1.7 fork errors in Win7

remind me it's not. Is this a known issue? Is there any information I can provide to help debug and fix this? Is there anything I can do on my end to investigate the issue? Thanks in advance for all your work on 1.7, it's looking good. -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA cygcheck

Re: Bash process remains after I close rxvt in certain ways

ll seems related to gnome-terminal and the related supporting gnome packages and not to bash itself, which is basically why I haven't posted anything about this here but this time it seems at least somebody might tell me that indeed it's not and point in a more hopeful direction. Thanks -- L

Re: Updated: cygwin-1.5.20-1

e 1.5.19-4: [ snip ] corinna: Implement updwtmpx. [ snip ] cgf: Rework pty master handling to avoid handle leak (thanks to Dave Korn for initial implementation). -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports:

Re: Updated: vim-7.0.035-1

On 6/23/06, Corinna Vinschen wrote: I have updated the version of vim on cygwin.com to 7.0.035-1. Thanks. Last time I had to compile from sources in order to get gvim. Is a GTK2 gvim included in 7.0.035-1 as it used to be in the 6.x series? -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA -- Unsubscribe

Re: updwtmpx

Thanks for the clarifications Igor. -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA On 6/22/06, Igor Peshansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU> reformatted. On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Luis P Caamano wrote: > On 6/22/06, Igor Peshansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: updwtmpx

Thanks for your reply Igor. Does that mean that the gnome-terminal I got from standard setup was compiled with the cygwin1.dll file from a snapshot? On 6/22/06, Igor Peshansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Luis P Caamano wrote: > The latest gnome-terminal, wh

updwtmpx

ygwin Perhaps it's in an experimental version? -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

On 12 Jun 2006 17:06:33 -, Reid Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Subject: Re: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1 Luis P Caamano wrote: > Well, almost. After updating I realized that gvim is not included :-( > so I ended up with a vim 7.0 and a gvim 6.4, which is not that useful > it

Re: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

Well, almost. After updating I realized that gvim is not included :-( so I ended up with a vim 7.0 and a gvim 6.4, which is not that useful it seems. Had to go back to 6.4. :-( On 6/12/06, Luis P Caamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/12/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1

On 6/12/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have updated the version of vim on cygwin.com to 7.0.017-1. This is the long awaited vim 7.0, latest patchlevel 17. Cygwin Vim still builds from the vanilla sources. Thank you -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA -- Unsub

Re: cygwin Digest 31 May 2006 18:20:53 -0000 Issue 4986

mething like that. I don't know if that's the problem but it's just one more thing to think about. -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://

Re: cygwin Digest 28 May 2006 16:43:42 -0000 Issue 4979

On 28 May 2006 16:43:42 -, Larry Hall wrote: Luis P Caamano wrote: > Is a cygwin binary of Vim 7.0 coming soon? Not immediately, no. The maintainer is currently away. On her return, I'm sure it's something she will look at. Good to know. Thanks for your reply. -- L

vim7?

Is a cygwin binary of Vim 7.0 coming soon? -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: when is using cygserver recommended? (thx)

ited that file was because I got the impression that using cygserver is what caused my fork problems. It seems though that people are getting the fork problems even when not using cygserver. I concluded that I needed to research cygserver a lot more to understand what's going. One day ..

Re: fork problem

bin/bash lpc2692 1 ? 10:04:22 /usr/bin/gvim lpc 3323520 2 10:07:49 /usr/bin/ps Hope that helps, -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Do

Re: Test release available: apache2-2.2.0-1

it's popular enough that someone > will definitely want it eventually. Wise choice. -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.c

No mod_proxy in apache2

ter a few hours of googling around have not produced any hints. Are there any plans to include it by default? If not, are there any instructions on how to compile apache2 to include mod_proxy? -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Pr