Jacek Piskozub wrote:
Hi,
This is funny. I used the same test as Josef Drexler but on Windows ME
after upgrading to cygwin 1.5.14. Of course the filesystem is also FAT
(FAT32 in my case).
First I tried it from a DOS window:
C:\Download\test>touch test.txt
C:\Download\test>ls -l test.txt
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 3 15:54, Josef Drexler wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
The bug is not that ctime was touched, but that mtime was not
touched. Normally, Windows updates mtime automatically if you edit a
file, only the ctime needed special treatment from cygwin. I have no
idea why Win98
cygwin internals so I don't know what's happening in
detail, although I'll be happy to help with the debugging, given some
pointers in where to look.
--
Josef Drexler | http://jdrexler.com/home/
-+-
ASH-2.05b$ ls -l versiond.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 Josef Josef 1 Apr 3 14:16 versiond.h
BASH-2.05b$ ls -l --time=ctime versiond.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 Josef Josef 1 Apr 3 14:16 versiond.h
As expected, both mtime and ctime are the same now.
--
Josef Drexler | http://jdrexler.com/home/
---
ar problem had been reported for utimes() (which I didn't search
for...), and I've confirmed that the problem disappeared when I
installed the latest snapshot.
Sorry for the noise.
--
Josef Drexler | http
must be a bug in cygwin itself.
For reference, the output of cygcheck -s -v -r -h for both versions can
be found here:
http://joesbox.cjb.net/~jdrexler/cygcheck-1.5.11.txt
http://joesbox.cjb.net/~jdrexler/cygcheck-1.5.13.txt
Any clues?
--
Josef Drexler | http://jdrexler.c
6 matches
Mail list logo
