Re: Pipe after Command Substitution does not resolve the substitution:

Firstly, i should clarify the problem definition asap by including this fourth example which shows a pipe working fine when it is not preceded by command substitution: $ grep 2 test.txt | grep 3 grep 2 test.txt | grep 3 + grep 2 test.txt + grep 3 23 Thanks Brian for all the suggestions and for sh

Re: Pipe after Command Substitution does not resolve the substitution:

Thanks loads for the reply Marco and for testing. It's much appreciated. Just to confirm, it also ran fine for me on W7 64 with cygwin 64bit. This issue is now on W10 64 with cygwin 64bit. Is this the output from cygcheck that you mean? I've marked where i've ommitted some of the -s output. It's

Pipe after Command Substitution does not resolve the substitution:

Hi, This is the first time i've ever submitted a bug report so i hope the below is ok. I am not a programmer although i do do some scripting. The below is the kind of 'command substitution then pipe' that i often used in Cygwin on Windows 7. Now that i've been forced to move to Windows 10 it no