Re: where is mh?

(n)mh is not in the cygwin distro. mebbe someday (as I understand) if someone were to step forward to make it happen. Earl Hood's done a some of the work already (below), tho someone would have to take his stuff and back-fit his changes into the autoconf stuff so that it'd actually build correc

Re: odd behavior of symlinks on Win XP

> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:43:04AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > >> On Jan 31 12:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > >> > > There's a patch in current Cygwin CVS which should solve the icon > >> > > problem. > >> > > >> > Super. Tho, will fixing "the icon problem

Re: odd behavior of symlinks on Win XP

> On Jan 31 12:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > There's a patch in current Cygwin CVS which should solve the icon > > > problem. > > > > Super. Tho, will fixing "the icon problem" also fix the behavior dichotomy > > between Explorer and Open/Save dialogs (which I not

exmh on Cygwin?

Does anyone have experience with installing "nmh" and "exmh" on Cygwin? Any major gotchas to watch out for? thanks, JeffH -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.ht

Re: odd behavior of symlinks on Win XP

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > There's a patch in current Cygwin CVS which should solve the icon > problem. Super. Tho, will fixing "the icon problem" also fix the behavior dichotomy between Explorer and Open/Save dialogs (which I noted in my original posting in this thread)? > If you want to use

Re: odd behavior of symlinks on Win XP SP2

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > If this were to come to pass and not be addressed by the cygwin > community, then it wouldn't make any sense to have the the default > (or even option) of creating cygwin symlinks as "winsymlinks". oops. add "...on XP and possibly derivatives thereof." JeffH -- Uns

Re: odd behavior of symlinks on Win XP SP2

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > He clearly complained about MS-Software that cannot handle > cygwin-created links, and you're talking about cygwin understand its > own symlinks correct. thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Apologies. I took the word "altogether" to mean "completely" but > obviously mi

Re: odd behavior of symlinks on Win XP SP2

> I'm glad that you're talking about "us" as a group. Anybody interested > in tracking that down? I'm not in a position to hack code on this unfortunately, but I can offer to test. I suspect it's important in the longer term to track this down because they (MSFT) ~could~ make further changes d

Re: odd behavior of symlinks on Win XP SP2

Thanks for looking at this Igor. Glad to know it isn't just me. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > And, lo and behold, on a plain WinXP SP1 (note, no SP2) I get the > same behavior. aha. innaresting. Well, I installed vanilla XP and then copied over a buncha directories from my old Win2k box, including

odd behavior of symlinks on Win XP SP2

I've searched this list and googled and all, and can't find anything about this issue, so perhaps it's some cockpit error on my part. Anyways, here's the issue/question... cygwin symlinks (aka cygwin-created windows shortcuts) seem to work differently, and incorrectly, from the windows pers

odd behavior of symlinks (aka cygwin-created shortcuts) on Win XP SP2

I've searched this list and googled and all, and can't find anything about this issue, so perhaps it's some cockpit error on my part. Anyways, here's the issue/question... cygwin symlinks (aka cygwin-created windows shortcuts) seem to work differently, and incorrectly, from the windows pers

has anyone compiled/ported gnomemeeting on cygwin?

has anyone compiled/ported gnomemeeting on cygwin? thanks, JeffH -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?

> Just outta' curiosity, beyond the satisfaction of accomplishing it,; charset=us-ascii > what would be gained? I wasn't sure what would be gained or the various ramifications. wanted to get hints about them, which this thread has done. JeffH -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#u

Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?

just outta curiosity, has anyone built Mozilla 1.3 on cygwin? thanks, JeffH -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: xsltproc segfaults after upgrading to docbook xsl stylesheetsv1.60.1

ded in, too... http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Software/passivetex/ > As for maintainership I volunteer, as this is a package I don't want to see > pulled from the distribution. thanks again, and as I said I can do some testing. JeffH ---

Re: xsltproc segfaults after upgrading to docbook xsl stylesheetsv1.60.1

ded in, too... http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Software/passivetex/ > As for maintainership I volunteer, as this is a package I don't want to see > pulled from the distribution. thanks again, and as I said I can do some testing. JeffH ---

Re: xsltproc segfaults after upgrading to docbook xsl stylesheetsv1.60.1

Robert Collins said on 19 Feb 2003 07:57:58 +1100: > Yes, and this takes the current version from 'old' to 'old + buggy'. > I've upped my priority to get a new release out. Uhmm, end of the week > should do it. Please, could we/you somehow get xsltproc & associated libs in the cygwin installation

Re: xsltproc segfaults after upgrading to docbook xsl stylesheetsv1.60.1

Robert Collins said on 19 Feb 2003 07:57:58 +1100: > Yes, and this takes the current version from 'old' to 'old + buggy'. > I've upped my priority to get a new release out. Uhmm, end of the week > should do it. Please, could we/you somehow get xsltproc & associated libs in the cygwin installati