re oddballs like me feel the need to
mess with it.
FWIW, I changed source.cc to default to "CWD" as the source so
that my CD-based install will "just work" without the user
having to click anything other than next/finish. I've found
that requiring anything
On 2009-01-13, Grant Edwards wrote:
> I built setup.exe from the sources in setup-2.592-1.7special.tar.bz2,
> and the resulting program seems a bit buggy. There have been
> two problems I've noticed so far:
>
> 1) It stopped and complatined that release/gcc/gcc-3.4.4-3.ta
On 2009-01-13, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2009-01-13, Dave Korn wrote:
>
>> Looking in the snapshot tarball, it seems that configure.in
>> does indeed have the original (unpatched or reverted) code, so
>> why doesn't it have the gpg-error-config-fake script as w
tarball. (I'll just manually add the missing stuff and
> re-upload it).
Thanks, I'm set. I guess nobody else builds their own
setup.exe. :)
Now to test the version that defaults to "local-install"...
--
Grant Edwards grante
xperiments and
examination of setup.exe sources have shown.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! ! Now I understand
at advanced MICROBIOLOGY and
visi.comth' new TAX REFORM laws!!
On 2009-01-13, Grant Edwards wrote:
> I'm tyring to build setup 2.573.2.3, but the configure always
> fails like this:
>
>
>checking whether padlock support is requested... yes
>checking for gpg-error-config... (cached)
> /home/grante/setup-2.573.2.3/gpg-error-
hinks there's supposed to be a file named
setup-2.573.2.3/gpg-error-config-fake and it can't find it?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Don't SANFORIZE me!!
at
visi.com
ked "OK" on all the error dialog boxes and the
install continued and produced what appears to be a working
install.
Should I be using an older version of setup sources? The
working setup.exe that I downloaded yesterday appears to be
version 2.573.2.3.
--
Grant Edwards
On 2009-01-13, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2009-01-13, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> On 01/12/2009, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> It looks like a batch file would work, but it pops up a
>>> "nuisance" console window. [Question: does "local directory"
On 2009-01-13, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 01/12/2009, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> It looks like a batch file would work, but it pops up a
>> "nuisance" console window. [Question: does "local directory"
>> refer to the directory where setup.exe is locat
On 2009-01-13, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 01/12/2009, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> It looks like a batch file would work, but it pops up a
>> "nuisance" console window. [Question: does "local directory"
>> refer to the directory where setup.exe is locat
stead of the "network
install" button. But I was hoping there was somthing a little
easier.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! does your DRESSING
at ROOM have enough ASPARAGUS?
se `uname` in
>*CYGWIN*)
> OS=Cygwin
> ;;
>*Darwin*)
> OS=Darwin
> ;;
>*)
> OS=Linux
> ;;
>esac
>
> and then try things like
>
>if [ ${OS} == "Linux" ]
>then
>..
>fi
That looks li
On 2009-01-08, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>> I mean the packages that are installed by default when you run
>> setup.exe for the first time and don't select any additional
>> packages. Maybe that set of packages is called something else?
>
>
On 2009-01-08, Grant Edwards wrote:
I didn't think it was relevent to the question at hand, but to
try to short-circuit yet another endless, pointless discussion
of the GPL, I'll explain exactly what the CD is for.
What I'm putting together is a CD with a very basic Cygwin
inst
On 2009-01-08, Christopher Faylor
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:25:59AM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>>One of the things I liked about Vin Shelton's script was that
>>it allowed me to customize what was installed by default. I
>>need to add 5-6 packages
On 2009-01-08, Christopher Faylor
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:23:16AM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>On 2009-01-07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>> And, as you noted, you need to distribute the source of your
>>> application
>>
>>I don't see
On 2009-01-07, Christopher Faylor
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 10:31:21PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>I need to put a Cygwin snapshot on CD[*].
>
> It's probably not what you want, and it is still a work in progress, but
> I've been generating downloadable Cygw
On 2009-01-07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>> I need to put a Cygwin snapshot on CD[*].
>>
>> To that end I've been searching the mailing list archive. So
>> far the scripts wirtten by Vin Shelton look like they're
>>
), but there's no guarantee that will be
true tomorrow or that the binaries built today will run on
tomorrow's "current" Cygwin.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! ! Now I understand
On 2009-01-05, Grant Edwards wrote:
> While trying to build a gcc 3.2.1 cross-compiler on a current
> Cygwin install, I get a repeatable segfault/internal-error from
> gcc 3.4.4 [see below].
Just to reiterate: I mis-interpreted the error message. It's
not the 3.4.4 native C
ibstdc++-v3] Error 2
make: Leaving directory `/home/grante/toolchain/build-gcc'
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Now we can become
at alcoholics!
visi.com
--
Unsubscr
at the share isn't persistent. You have to do
>> > the above every time you log in using pubkey.
>>
>> That would be fine, but it doesn't work.
>
> Weird. It works for me every time.
Windows is like that.
--
Grant Edwards
On 2008-01-17, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 17 19:50, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2008-01-17, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >>> It means that you can have the same (network) drive letter
>> &
he recipe to create a
> system-owned shell.
Why the difference in userland depending on which
authentication method is used?
That seems really counter-intuitive.
[and people wonder why I hate using MS Windows...]
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Jesuit priest
programs that
> elevate their privileges as far as the elevated process is not
> aware of the network drives of the user...
>
> FYI, the "net config workstation" command isn't working from a
> ssh shell.
It works fine under XP when logged in using password
authenticatio
the group, I see this is a known issue and is
>> caused by the lack of a "logon session" (whatever that is) in
>> the case of public-key authentication.
>>
> Can you perform a net view \\targetserver ?
Yes, that works fine. I see the list of exported directories
and pri
On 2008-01-16, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running Cygwin sshd on a WinXP-Pro machine. When I ssh-in
> using a password, I can map drives with "net use". When I set
> up an authorized_keys file so I don't have to enter a password,
> &
.
Is there any way to get mapped drives and public-key
authentication working together?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm having fun
at HITCHHIKING to CINCINNATI
visi.comor
29 matches
Mail list logo
