Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 04:10:05PM +0200, Dirk Napierala wrote:
Dave Korn schrieb:
Dirk Napierala wrote on 14 October 2008 14:00:
[SNIP]
One of the main reasons you get so few replies is because nobody can
find what you're actually saying among the
Dave Korn schrieb:
Dirk Napierala wrote on 14 October 2008 14:00:
[SNIP]
One of the main reasons you get so few replies is because nobody can find
what you're actually saying among the mass of redundant and
illegibly-formatted quotes and quotes of quotes in all your posts. If you
ma
Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] schrieb:
Dirk Napierala wrote on Friday, October 10, 2008 5:36 AM:
Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] schrieb:
From: Dirk Napierala wrote on Thursday, October 09, 2008 11:48 AM
I'll presume the following.
- You've a "good" re
Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] schrieb:
From: Dirk Napierala wrote on Thursday, October 09, 2008 11:48 AM
Phil Betts schrieb:
Yes, the file called sfx-file.exe
I can make it available for you to test.
Please just reply to my corp. address and I can provide you with
download details
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 04:48:20PM +0200, Dirk Napierala wrote:
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
If I missed feedback to the thread below I have to apologize.
Otherwise I would like to recall this (my last post)again
This is getting old. Rather than
Phil Betts schrieb:
Dirk Napierala wrote on Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:51 AM::
If I missed feedback to the thread below I have to apologize.
Otherwise I would like to recall this (my last post)again
Please don't keep reposting the same message. You can google the
mailing
it on our ftp server and make it avail for your eyes
only. You may understand that this is company confidential.
Best Regards Dirk Napierala
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:51:23AM +0200, Dirk Napierala wrote:
If I missed feedback to the thread below I have to
If I missed feedback to the thread below I have to apologize.
Otherwise I would like to recall this (my last post)again
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:57:32PM +0200, Dirk Napierala wrote:
Dave Korn schrieb:
Dirk Napierala wrote on 25 September 2008 09:55
If I missed feedback to the thread below I have to apologize.
Otherwise I would like to recall this (my last post)again
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:57:32PM +0200, Dirk Napierala wrote:
Dave Korn schrieb:
Dirk Napierala wrote on 25 September 2008 09:55
If I missed feedback to the thread below I have to apologize.
Otherwise I would like to recall this (my last post)again
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:57:32PM +0200, Dirk Napierala wrote:
Dave Korn schrieb:
Dirk Napierala wrote on 25 September 2008 09:55
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:57:32PM +0200, Dirk Napierala wrote:
Dave Korn schrieb:
Dirk Napierala wrote on 25 September 2008 09:55:
From what we understand by reading the guideline "Changing Cygwin's
Maximum Memory" the resu
Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] schrieb:
Dirk Napierala wrote on Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:51 PM:
using other methods to launch the file (like unzip or cmd /c) is not
an option due to company internals.
Can we assume that using the cygwin program cygstart.exe* is
also ruled
Marco Atzeri schrieb:
--- Dirk Napierala ha scritto:
Even if this would help, it doesn't explain, why on
the same system,
without any other change than
switching the cygwin versions, it works with the old
one and doesn't
work with the current one
to eventually try to id
Marco Atzeri schrieb:
--- Dave Korn ha scritto:
Dirk Napierala wrote on 25 September 2008 09:55:
So the SFX file itself doesn't seem to cause this
problem.
Random and wacky idea: What happens if you prepend
Cygwin's
/bin/unzipsfx.exe to the existing SFX and t
Dave Korn schrieb:
Dirk Napierala wrote on 25 September 2008 09:55:
From what we understand by reading the guideline "Changing Cygwin's
Maximum Memory" the result
of the small program written by DJ Delorie tests the memory allocation
limit on your system.
Running the prog
First of all sorry if we missed to answer a question before.
But as you said: (which wouldn't be surprising given the amount of noise
on this thread)
Trying to be more accurate from now on :-)
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:51:28PM +0200, Dirk Napierala
.
It seems to be hardware and memory amount independent. Tested on several
Dell desktop systems with 2GB
and finaly on my Laptop with 4GB memory.
Looking forward to a cygwin developer to troubleshoot this.
Thanks in advance for any constructive feeback.
Best Regards
Dirk Napierala
--
Un
the application to do. Having control over the source
will make your company money in the long-term.
So, now I'm confused. Is this a problem with Cygwin or Windows?
Best of luck in finding a solution,
Barry Smith
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Napierala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
always a way to write an application
that will work in the "new" circumstances, that will give you source
that you have more control over, and will perform the task that you need
for the source and the application to do. Having control over the source
will make your company money in the l
with ./ execution.;-)
No way for a workaround like unzip, recreating the zipfile with spanning
method or others.
Regards Dirk
Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] schrieb:
Dirk Napierala wrote on Friday, September 19, 2008 9:59 AM:
We discovered an issue trying to open big self extractingzip
a fix.
Best Regard Dirk Napierala
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
21 matches
Mail list logo
