On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:48:47PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>
> The NASM package in Cygwin is getting a tad long in the tooth. There is
> NASM 2.08.02 available, but 2.10.03 is current, i.e. NASM has done two
> major releases in the meantime. The package for Cygwin was create
Hello everybody!
The NASM package in Cygwin is getting a tad long in the tooth. There is
NASM 2.08.02 available, but 2.10.03 is current, i.e. NASM has done two
major releases in the meantime. The package for Cygwin was created
over two years ago.
Newer NASM versions are required to assemble mod
Charles Wilson wrote:
Diego Biurrun wrote:
Next time you call shenanigans, get your facts straight first please.
I never claimed that we do not *have* OS-specific workarounds, I said
we do not *add* them.
That's a vey fine distinction and was not at all clear from the
fore
Diego Biurrun wrote:
[...]
So all in all you have refuted some points I never made, while bungling
some of the research used to substantiate your claims. What is the
point you are trying to prove here?
To be a bit more precise and constructive: We have had workarounds of
all sorts in the
Charles Wilson wrote:
Diego Biurrun wrote:
llrint is required, so I guess Cygwin compilation will indeed be
broken for a while. We don't add OS-specific workarounds to FFmpeg.
I call shenanigans.
Next time you call shenanigans, get your facts straight first please. I
never claimed
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:20:23PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
llrint is required, so I guess Cygwin compilation will indeed be broken for
a while. We don't add OS-specific workarounds to FFmpeg.
So what other kinds of workarounds do you add?
Workaround
Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Diego Biurrun wrote:
Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Diego Biurrun wrote:
I understand that adding llrint to Cygwin is probably not hard at
all for somebody familiar with Cygwin. However, I am not such a
person and I don't even h
Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Diego Biurrun wrote:
Tim Prince wrote:
Diego Biurrun wrote:
I have noticed that Cygwin does not implement llrint. However,
llrint is part of C99 and not having it available makes some
applications (for example MPlayer and FFmpeg) fail to compile
Tim Prince wrote:
Diego Biurrun wrote:
I have noticed that Cygwin does not implement llrint. However, llrint
is part of C99 and not having it available makes some applications (for
example MPlayer and FFmpeg) fail to compile.
Are there any plans to implement llrint (in the near future
Hi!
I have noticed that Cygwin does not implement llrint. However, llrint
is part of C99 and not having it available makes some applications (for
example MPlayer and FFmpeg) fail to compile.
Are there any plans to implement llrint (in the near future)?
best regards
Diego
--
Unsubscribe i
10 matches
Mail list logo
