> This is a common problem. I guess newlib/cygwin got the oldest set
> and, afaik, the GCC toplevel stuff is kind of the master. It would
> be nice if we had some automatism in place to keep all former src
> repos in sync.
There was never any agreement on who the "master" was for toplevel
sourc
> DJ, can you add these files to the list that we get email about?
Added: ltgcc.m4 ltmain.sh ltoptions.m4 ltsugar.m4 ltversion.m4 lt~obsolete.m4
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.h
> 2004-10-12 Kelley Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * configure.in (*-*-cygwin*): Supress warning when newlib not present.
> * configure: Regenerate.
This is OK.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Some comments:
> If they want the source from the LUG, they should contact us about
> prices.
This is acceptable, but GPL 3b requires that you provide a *written*
promise to that effect. IMHO it only needs to be sufficiently legal
to be a binding contract - i.e. dated and authenticatable. How
> Lawyer? Three years? We don't even have funds to buy pizza and
> beer let alone a lawyer. We are not in the software distribution
> business. That's what Red Hat is for. That is why I buy and
> recommend Red Hat.
If RedHat distributed cygwin under GPL 3b, then you could redistribute
that C
> >Hmm...good point. OK, I will fess up. I have such a mirror that is
> >only for the convenience of my co-workers and myself. It is not
> >distributed outside of our company. Note that I was just trying to save
> >bandwidth and disk space.
> >
> >If this is considered a GPL violation (and in
6 matches
Mail list logo
