RE: Post install smoke test (or "Oh no not again")

>-Original Message- >From: Max Bowsher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 11 March 2003 13:40 >To: Bruce Adams [TEPG Sunbury] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Post install smoke test (or "Oh no not again") > > >On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Bruce Adams [

Post install smoke test (or "Oh no not again")

Hi, I just did a fresh installation of gcc on another machine and had an "oh no not again" moment. Attempting to compile: int main(int argc,char** argv) { return 0; } //main Gives the output: gcc hello.o -o hello.exe -lstdc++ hello.o(.text+0x0):fake: multiple definition of `_mainCRTStar

RE: gcc Core Dump

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 06 March 2003 15:14 >To: Max Bowsher >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: gcc Core Dump > > >Max, David, > >thanks very much for your help. >I didn't know that my cygwin version is so old. I had just >clean in

RE: Exception: STATUS_PRIVILEGED_INSTRUCTION occurs before main is executed.

>-Original Message- >From: Max Bowsher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 06 March 2003 14:43 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Exception: STATUS_PRIVILEGED_INSTRUCTION occurs >before main is executed. > > >> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Bruce Adams [TEPG Sunbur

RE: Exception: STATUS_PRIVILEGED_INSTRUCTION occurs before main is executed.

>-Original Message- >From: Max Bowsher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 06 March 2003 11:39 >To: Bruce Adams [TEPG Sunbury] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Exception: STATUS_PRIVILEGED_INSTRUCTION occurs >before main is executed. > > >Br

RE: whining (was: RE: Why is gcc3.2 prerelease?)

>-Original Message- >From: Stephan Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 05 March 2003 21:34 >To: Jim Drash; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: OT: whining (was: RE: Why is gcc3.2 prerelease?) > > >I'm not being thin-skinned -- I was using an example from >Andrew's mail (the M$ reference) t

RE: Exception: STATUS_PRIVILEGED_INSTRUCTION occurs before main is executed.

>-Original Message- >From: Steven O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 05 March 2003 11:36 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Exception: STATUS_PRIVILEGED_INSTRUCTION occurs >before main is executed. > > >Bruce Adams wrote: >> I have lately

RE: Exception: STATUS_PRIVILEGED_INSTRUCTION occurs before main is executed.

>-Original Message- >From: Brian Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 05 March 2003 21:22 >To: Bruce Adams [TEPG Sunbury] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Exception: STATUS_PRIVILEGED_INSTRUCTION occurs >before main is executed. > > >A comment and a q

RE: Why is gcc 3.2 prerelease?

>-Original Message- >From: Andrew Markebo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 05 March 2003 16:15 >To: Bruce Adams [TEPG Sunbury] >Subject: Re: Why is gcc 3.2 prerelease? > > >Hi! > >I suppose you have heard this, but I vote for that GCC 3 burfs >on an e

RE: Why is gcc 3.2 prerelease?

> >On Wednesday, March 5, 2003 at 10:24:55, Bruce Adams wrote: [...] >> The reason I ask is that I need to use gcc 3.0 for its >> better ISO C++ compliance and STL but I'm having a lot of problems >> with programs compiling (and linting) perfectly but crashing &

Why is gcc 3.2 prerelease?

Hi, The answer to this question ought to be in the documentation somewhere but I couldn't find it. The version of gcc installed by setup is: gcc version 3.2 20020818 (prerelease) Ignoring the 2.9x version. Why are we still using a prerelease version? According to gcc.gnu.org the versions

Exception: STATUS_PRIVILEGED_INSTRUCTION occurs before main is executed.

Hi, I have lately been having real problems with vanilla gcc 3.2 generating executables that crash. Its manifestation does not seem to follow an obvious pattern and changing the options to gcc (e.g. -ggdb versus -gstabs or no -g at all) does not make any difference. Does anybody have any idea

RE: Java (1 of 3): Gcj - Hello world exe (again)

>-Original Message- >From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 07 January 2003 09:51 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Java (1 of 3): Gcj - Hello world exe (again) > >I don't think the version number matters, my fair guess is >that for some >reason a dir or a file was "lo

RE: Java (1 of 3): Gcj - Hello world exe (again)

>-Original Message- >From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 06 January 2003 11:11 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Java (1 of 3): Gcj - Hello world exe (again) > > >Bruce Adams wrote: > >>Hello.java(note: case is important in this

Java (2 of 3): where is gij?

Hi, Just a quick question (for the FAQ?). I notice that gij (the GNU java virtual machine) is not installed along with gcj. I presume this is because the M$ and Sun JVMs are perfectly adequate for the task. I thought this would be documented somewhere. Anyone know?

Java (1 of 3): Gcj - Hello world exe (again)

Hi, This ought to be in the FAQ but I couldn't find it. I can't seem to get a hello world program to work as an executable though it works fine with the JVM. I've seen this asked before but not the answer. See code below. Hello.java(note: case is important in this filename) ==